Search for: "Rick Hasen & John Matsusaka, guest-blogging"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2011, 9:31 pm
John Matsusaka will be guest-blogging this week on their new article, Aggressive Enforcement of the Single Subject Rule. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 7:52 am
(Rick Hasen & John Matsusaka, guest-blogging) You can read the indictment here. [read post]
31 May 2011, 4:33 pm
(Rick Hasen & John Matsusaka, guest-blogging) Eugene blogged last week about United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 2:24 pm
(Rick Hasen & John Matsusaka, guest-blogging) Following up on this post, I have posted the supplemental briefs filed in this case. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 9:45 pm
(Rick Hasen & John Matsusaka, guest-blogging) The single subject requirement is a technical rule that is often used to invalidate voter initiatives, either before or after they go to the ballot. [read post]
31 May 2011, 8:40 am
(Rick Hasen & John Matsusaka, guest-blogging) Many thanks to Eugene for giving us the opportunity to blog about our article, Aggressive Enforcement of the Single Subject Rule (pdf) which appeared recently in the Election Law Journal’s special symposium issue honoring the scholarship of election law pioneer, Dan Lowenstein.The single subject rule — a requirement that initiatives embrace only one subject — is… [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 9:46 pm
(Rick Hasen & John Matsusaka, guest-blogging) A popular tactic for fighting a ballot initiative is to claim it violates the single subject rule, leaving it to a panel of judges to decide its fate and possibly prevent it from reaching the voters. [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:26 pm
(Rick Hasen & John Matsusaka, guest-blogging) In yesterday’s post, we explained the basics of the “single subject” rule: initiatives may contain only one “subject” or they are unenforceable. [read post]
