Search for: "STATE v. HERNANDEZ"
Results 801 - 820
of 1,248
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2012, 8:21 am
Tuesday's Supreme Court ruling in Martinez v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 4:04 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 5:33 am
Holder, 558 F.3d 53, 60 (1st Cir. 2009) (rejecting petitioners' claims the BIA is precluded from considering the visibility of a group); and Fuentes-Hernandez v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 6:05 am
PAJ followed the holding in Hernandez v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
United States Surgical Corp. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 9:46 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Declaratory Judgment Opinions Body: Below is today's Declaratory Judgment Appellate Court opinion: AC32872 - Hernandez v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 10:34 am
" The appellate judge in Hernandez v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 6:52 am
Hernandez v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 11:55 am
Finally, in Hernandez v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 1:37 pm
Unfortunately, that's the situation Melinda Hernandez found herself in United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 9:01 pm
Hernandez v. [read post]
CA11: Damage to door in attempt to enter, without entry, is de minimus for Fourth Amendment purposes
28 Jan 2012, 9:15 pm
Hernandez, 418 F.3d 1206, 1212 n.7 (11th Cir. 2005) (stating that "[o]f trifles the law does not concern itself: De minimis non curat lex"); United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 6:45 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 1:19 pm
Supreme Court decision regarding GPS tracking in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 8:28 am
More on the 1972 case of Furman v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 8:31 am
Later, Mid-Century withdrew its denial based on the Texas Supreme Court opinion in Hernandez v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 11:52 am
The docket in Hernandez v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
Goes back 4 years to Obama v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:12 pm
On February 7 in San Francisco, the court will hear the following cases (with the issues presented as stated on the court’s website): People v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 11:40 am
” She further argued a previous ruling by a state judge also contained mistakes about whether Hernandez-Llanas met the threshold for “intellectual disability,” formerly called mental retardation. [read post]
