Search for: "State of Maine v. Cross" Results 801 - 820 of 1,367
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2014, 10:14 am by Lyle Denniston
Rickard grew out of a chase ten years ago that crossed a state line from Arkansas into Tennessee, and continued even after police had appeared to have the fleeing car cornered on the streets of Memphis. [read post]
27 May 2014, 12:15 am
In particular he stated that 'there was no suggestion from either party that the Shanks patents were crucial to Unilever’s success. [read post]
22 May 2014, 8:44 am
judgment in the case of Generics (UK) Ltd (t/a Mylan) v Richter Gedeon Vegyeszeti Gyar RT [2014] EWHC 1666 (Pat) (22 May 2014). [read post]
20 May 2014, 5:04 am by Stephen Page
It is actual reliance by the promisee, and the state of affairs so created, which answers the concern that equitable estoppel not be allowed to outflank Jorden v Money by dispensing with the need for consideration if a promise is to be enforceable as a contract. [read post]
10 May 2014, 1:09 pm
Toro is complicated not only by the fact that there is a criminal matter pending, but also because the widow lives out-of-state, keeping residents in Maine and New York. [read post]
9 May 2014, 12:36 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The main purpose of the exhibits in this case was for police business in maintaining the safety of the highway. [read post]
9 May 2014, 5:53 am by Joy Waltemath
The school is located on a relatively narrow, two-way public street that runs in from of the school’s main entrance. [read post]
5 May 2014, 9:05 am by Lyle Denniston
  Justice Elena Kagan wrote the main dissent, joined by Justices Stephen G. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:29 am by Mark Walsh
The cases concern an EPA regulation under the Clean Air Act called the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule, or Transport Rule. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 9:23 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 Justice Theis asked whether it was true that the main thrust of the defendant's argument was being denied the opportunity to be heard. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 6:15 am by Joy Waltemath
Both of the parties, the court noted, missed the main point by “focusing their attention on the question of whether a start time of 9:15 a.m. was reasonable. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 8:29 am
In the main, the Court found defendant’s objections were without merit, or went to the credibility of Thomas’s testimony, which were to be tested not by preclusion but by “[v]igorous cross-examination, presentation of contrary evidence, and careful instruction on the burden of proof,” which “are the traditional and appropriate means of attacking shaky but admissible evidence. [read post]