Search for: "State of Montana v. United States" Results 801 - 820 of 1,074
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2012, 8:27 am by Joe Palazzolo
In a Dec. 30 opinion, the Montana Supreme Court upheld a state law barring corporate spending to support or oppose political candidates or parties, saying Citizens United only applies to federal elections. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:46 am by Bart Torvik
  The Anaconda corporation controlled the state during a significant portion of Montana’s history and the statute is, evidently a response to that control. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 11:24 am by Ed Wallis
Prescription drugs may not be sold in the United States unless they are first approved by the FDA. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 3:09 pm by Joe Palazzolo
Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:12 am by Marissa Miller
At Cato@Liberty, Trevor Burrus predicts that the Court will summarily reverse the Montana Supreme Court’s recent decision upholding the state’s ban on independent expenditures by corporations – a ruling that Burrus calls an attempt to “nullify” Citizens United. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 6:30 am by Bart Torvik
GILLETTE:  The Montana Supreme Court made the news recently for its decision in Western Tradition Partnership, Inc., v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:00 am by Emily Chan
It was estimated by The Chronicle of Philanthropy that $246.9 million was raised from donors in the United States in the first month following the disaster. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 8:42 am by Sam Favate
” Late Friday, the Montana Supreme Court defied the Citizens United decision, holding that its state law banning corporate spending in elections is valid, setting up what could be a new challenge to the 2010 case, as we detailed here, and our own Jess Bravin reported here. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 8:18 am by constitutional lawblogger
The Montana Supreme Court last week upheld state campaign spending limitations on corporations against a free speech challenge under Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 6:57 am by Conor McEvily
Briefly: In Forbes, Kashmir Hill discusses a recent decision by a federal magistrate judge who declined to wait for the Court to issue its decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 5:13 am by Joe Palazzolo
Testing Citizens United: Our own Jess Bravin has more on the Montana Supreme Court’s ruling late last week that the U.S. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 12:12 pm by Nabiha Syed
  And at Cato@Liberty, Ilya Shapiro previews the issues in United States v. [read post]