Search for: "State of New Jersey v. United States" Results 801 - 820 of 3,243
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2015, 7:56 am by Phillips & Associates
New Jersey was the first state to pass a law against unemployment discrimination in 2011, although its law is limited in scope. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 4:22 pm
The Duragesic-brand patch is made by Alza Corp., a Mountain View, California, company owned by New Brunswick, New Jersey- based Johnson & Johnson, the world's biggest maker of medical devices. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
United States, 649 A.2d 301, 308 (D.C. 1994); Carson v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 7:16 am by Maurice W. McLaughlin
  While the case arose in Pennsylvania Federal Court, the Third Circuit rules on appeals from federal courts in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware and the United States Virgin Islands, so it’s decisions determine how federal law, including the Fair Labor Standards Act, will be applied are binding in New Jersey. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 1:01 pm by Unknown
United States (Endangered Species Act; Water Rights)Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 12:18 pm
In analyzing this case, the Supreme Court of New Jersey acknowledged that sexually oriented speech is protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 9:56 am by Charles Abut
Clinton, Secretary of State; U.S. (2012); United States Supreme Court, March 21, 2012 [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 2:31 pm by Colby Pastre
The laws at issue permitted in-state wineries only to sell to retailers and consumers and prohibited the importation of more than a gallon of out-of-state wine for personal use without a special permit from the state of New Jersey. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 5:33 pm by Sandra C. Fava
  Parents from New Jersey and other states are faced in a similar battle trying to have their children returned to them from foreign nations. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:37 pm by SteinMcewen, LLP
The company is a New Jersey corporation with its principal place of business in Hamilton, New Jersey. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 4:56 am
In analyzing the motion, the district court explained that "New Jersey choice-of-law rules dictate that it is necessary to apply the substantive law of each Plaintiff's home state" and that 25 plaintiffs are citizens of California, so the court applied California law in determining whether to award attorney fees to the California plaintiffs. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 5:24 am by Nancy E. Halpern, D.V.M.
  In New Jersey, for example, the regulations (not statute) defines the VCPR as i) The veterinarian has undertaken to make medical judgments regarding the health of an animal or animals, herd or flock being treated and the need for medical treatment; ii) The client has retained the services of the veterinarian; iii) The veterinarian has sufficient knowledge of the animal or animals, herd or flock to initiate at least a general or preliminary diagnosis of the medical condition… [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 4:20 pm by Peter Vodola
In this post is a description of the life settlements business, courtesy of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in its opinion in Greenwich Life Settlements, Inc. v. [read post]