Search for: "State v. A. T. D."
Results 801 - 820
of 23,969
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2023, 2:19 pm
In my earlier post, I mentioned this passage reminded me of United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 11:28 am
" So if process wasn't served in this manner (e.g., the summons wasn't signed), it'd be invalid, because the rule says so. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 7:41 am
(1977)], [c] sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law," and "the work, [a] taken as a whole, [b] lacks serious [c] literary, artistic, political, or scientific value[, [d] applying national standards and not just community standards. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 5:30 pm
United States case. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:41 am
App. 2004), aff’d on other grounds, 919 So. 2d 392 (Fla. 2006); and Cain v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
NLRB v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 1:01 pm
[T]the manufacturer of the tampons is properly before the Court and available for full recovery.Wichmann v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 12:27 am
Cir. 2007) (quoting United States v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 11:08 pm
BOTELHO, Petitioners v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 3:54 am
(For an example of what can happen if it isn’t, read State v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 6:40 am
Alphabet LinkedIn Isn’t a State Actor–Perez v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 3:46 pm
Text that California doesn't have. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 5:35 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 12:25 pm
I've only had a chance to read the SCt's opinion in DA's Office v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 12:10 pm
I don’t think so, and to explain why, I’m going to need to recount a little bit of Supreme Court history involving section 111(d) that has been largely absent from conversations about West Virginia v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 11:37 am
Wilson, 713 F.3d 887, 895-86 (7th Cir. 2013) ("[t]his procedure is not inconsistent with . . . [read post]
23 May 2022, 1:04 pm
The problem is those pesky state usury laws. [read post]
9 Oct 2004, 3:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 12:03 pm
” People don’t live in one state, forever, though. [read post]
15 May 2017, 9:25 am
[t]he particular duty the officer was performing when assaulted is not of primary importance,” unlike in the R/D/O context); State v. [read post]
