Search for: "State v. Burden"
Results 801 - 820
of 22,155
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
Martin Act Claims Arising Out of Stock Spinning In the Late 1990s In 2006, the New York State Supreme Court decided State v. [read post]
26 Sep 2024, 12:15 am
In Tornetta v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 6:11 pm
Reid Nelson won in State v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:02 am
Hawaii, the soon-to-be retired jurist likely agreed that the “heavy burden” was satisfied because of the risk of intruding onto the executive’s powers. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 6:55 am
V. [read post]
3 May 2015, 4:30 am
In United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 9:40 am
About a month and a half ago, Judge Lucy Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California held that Samsung had not waived its "article of manufacture" argument in the first Apple v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 8:09 am
It first re-stated the accommodation doctrine: To obtain relief on a claim that the mineral lessee has failed to accommodate an existing use of the surface, the surface owner has the burden to prove that (1) the lessee's use completely precludes or substantially impairs the existing use, and (2) there is no reasonable alternative method available to the surface owner by which the existing use can be continued. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 10:58 am
Harris v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 3:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 10:44 am
Ct.at 838 (quoting Harries v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 5:56 am
Garcia v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 2:56 pm
Wills v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 3:17 am
” (per Scott Baker L.J. in Sowden v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 9:00 am
Links: NWC Amicus brief in Powers v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 5:44 am
In Gross v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
In Murdock v Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943), the U.S. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 2:29 am
He explained that a significant aim of these measures was to ensure that EU nationals from one member state should not be able to exercise their rights of residence in another member state so as to become an unreasonable burden on the social assistance system. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:05 pm
— Walter Olson (@walterolson) April 22, 2014 Tweet Tags: racial preferences, Sonia Sotomayor, Supreme CourtSchuette v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176]. *** This case was decided with another case involving the same parties and is posted at http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2020/2020_04302.htm. [read post]
