Search for: "State v. Cross"
Results 801 - 820
of 14,951
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2022, 9:14 am
District Court for the Eastern District of New Orleans in the matter United States v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:29 pm
PARAMOUNT HOMES, LLC, a MONTANA LLC, UNITED STATES SEAMLESS OF SW MONTANA, Inc., a Montana corporation, Defendants, Appellees and Cross-Appellants. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
Socialist Workers Party v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 8:50 am
Following on the heels of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Bullcoming v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 7:36 am
Facebook; Riggs v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 2:49 pm
In Thompson v Leben Home for Adults, the court stated that in the absence of such a good cause showing, the court has no discretion to entertain even a meritorious, non-prejudicial cross motion for summary judgment. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 10:07 am
Andrée Sophia Blumstein is the solicitor general of Tennessee, which joined 29 other states in an amicus brief in support of the constitutionality of the cross in The American Legion v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 2:13 pm
Christina Waugh won in State v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 1:20 pm
Court of Appeal Reverses a Judgment Sustaining a Demurrer by Blue CrossCoast Plaza Doctors Hospital v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:00 am
Note: David Meyer-Lindenberg crosses the President and General Counsel of the Institute for Justice, Scott Bullock, one of the nation’s foremost opponents of eminent-domain abuse. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 5:23 am
[t]he declarant testifies at the trial or hearing and is subject to cross-examination concerning the statement, and the statement is...consistent with the declarant's testimony and helpful to the... [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:49 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia Circuit, in a 2 to 1 decision, vacated the 2011 Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (aka the Transport Rule). [read post]
22 May 2025, 3:45 am
It’s been clear for a while now that the Trump administration ignored Judge Boasberg’s order, violated Judge Xinis’ order and even ignored the Supreme Court’s decision in Noem v. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 3:12 am
The cable had lost its inviolability, for all purposes, including its use in cross-examination or evidence in the present proceedings. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 11:50 am
When I read Padilla v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 4:33 pm
The ranching company also entered into a lease with the State for the abutting property that the ditch crossed. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 7:37 am
Alas, I've been busy with other things, and haven't paid close attention to the Salazar v. [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 7:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 12:50 pm
It’s nothing like an instance in which one State is complaining that another State has dumped sewage into a body of water that’s crossed the border.Justice Kagan is correct that, in Mass v. [read post]
