Search for: "State v. Good Bear"
Results 801 - 820
of 5,192
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
”[12] Shareholders bear the brunt of these abuses; “[i]nvestors always are the ultimate losers when extortionate ‘settlements’ are extracted from issuers. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 4:12 pm
The Court stated it was ‘not persuaded’ by the appeal courts’ approach, and ‘cannot share their conclusion’. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 2:22 pm
ABC v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 6:58 am
The Federal Circuit found that Carolina had met this test of standing because it sold goods bearing the same mark. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 8:40 am
Carr's testimony sufficiently established the value of the stolen goods to be at least $750.State v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 9:24 am
For the trade mark to fulfil its essential role in the system of undistorted competition, it must offer a guarantee that all the goods or services bearing it have been manufactured or supplied under the control of a single undertaking which is responsible for their quality. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:10 am
The end result was a comprehensive and forensic enquiry, detailing each event which had a bearing on Ms Cadwalladr’s state of mind, and ultimately the reasonable belief in the public interest value of the words uttered in the TED Talk. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 9:35 am
Pritchard v. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 11:39 pm
The Oatmeal v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 4:25 am
And so the government came down so hard on her that even the 7th Circuit dissenter in United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 11:12 am
§ 3500.14(g)(2) (“If the payment of a thing of value bears no reasonable relationship to the market value of the goods or services provided, then the excess is not for services or goods actually performed or provided. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 8:24 am
Also, the good people at the PTO should look at this case as a well-deserved pat on the back. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 4:40 pm
As we argued in an amicus brief, we hope New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 5:18 am
Dame Janet Smith, in wording subsequently wholly endorsed by Lord Hutton, stated: “… in my view Article 10(1) does not bear upon the right of access to information that another holds but has not made accessible and does not wish to impart… The first sentence states the principle: ‘Everyone has the right of freedom of expression’. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 6:33 pm
Backer, Race, "The Race," and the Republic: Re-conceiving Judicial Authority After Bush v. [read post]
13 Oct 2006, 6:06 am
Plaintiffs allege "unauthorized and unlawful uses of pirated copies of Plaintiffs' original Works on various goods" that omit to state that defendants' "counterfeits" are unauthorized, which constitutes false and misleading representations that defendants' goods bear plaintiffs' authorized designs. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:49 am
Switzerland (Application No. 41615/07), Grand Chamber, where the requesting State was Israel, and X v. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
In particular, the defendants claimed that (1) the California judgment was unenforceable for lack of personal jurisdiction, (2) the agreement was unenforceable under the HSSA because the plaintiff failed to advise the defendants of their cancellation rights, and (3) the plaintiff failed to mitigate its damages and breached the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:00 am
Girdharilal Yadav (2004) 6 SCC 325; State of Maharashtra v. [read post]
