Search for: "State v. Hernandez"
Results 801 - 820
of 1,240
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2012, 11:55 am
Finally, in Hernandez v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 1:37 pm
Unfortunately, that's the situation Melinda Hernandez found herself in United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 9:01 pm
Hernandez v. [read post]
CA11: Damage to door in attempt to enter, without entry, is de minimus for Fourth Amendment purposes
28 Jan 2012, 9:15 pm
Hernandez, 418 F.3d 1206, 1212 n.7 (11th Cir. 2005) (stating that "[o]f trifles the law does not concern itself: De minimis non curat lex"); United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 6:45 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 1:19 pm
Supreme Court decision regarding GPS tracking in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 8:28 am
More on the 1972 case of Furman v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 8:31 am
Later, Mid-Century withdrew its denial based on the Texas Supreme Court opinion in Hernandez v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 11:52 am
The docket in Hernandez v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
Goes back 4 years to Obama v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:12 pm
On February 7 in San Francisco, the court will hear the following cases (with the issues presented as stated on the court’s website): People v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 11:40 am
” She further argued a previous ruling by a state judge also contained mistakes about whether Hernandez-Llanas met the threshold for “intellectual disability,” formerly called mental retardation. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 5:58 am
Hernandez, 183 F.Supp.2d 468 (U.S. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 3:12 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 7:10 am
The style of the case is Ruben and Anita Hernandez v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 10:39 pm
James V. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:04 am
United States, 11-6464; Hernandez v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:42 pm
Hernandez-Perez, No. 143543, the Michigan Supreme Court reversed in part the judgment of the Court of Appeals because the statements made on the record regarding the potential length of the defendant’s sentence could not reasonably have led him to believe that the plea agreement had a sentencing component, and the circuit judge clearly stated that no promise had been made about the sentence the defendant would receive. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 5:16 am
Tom Corbett’s nomination of David Unkovic as the receiver to take over the state capital’s fiscal recovery. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 4:47 am
” There was no deadline in the warrant for completion of the forensic examination and analysis, “nor [does] the Fourth Amendment provide[] for a specific time limit in which a computer may undergo a government forensic examination after it has been seized pursuant to a search warrant” (United States v Hernandez, 183 F Supp 2d 468, 480; see United States v Syphers, 426 F3d 461, 469, cert denied 547 U.S. 1158, 126 S. [read post]
