Search for: "State v. Neil" Results 801 - 820 of 3,048
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm by ccoleburn
  According to that opinion, none of the three final states’ ratifications could count towards Article V’s ¾ requirement. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:52 pm by Amy Howe
He urged the state court to apply a test outlined by the Supreme Court in two property rights cases, Nollan v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
In other words, Roberts and Ginsburg were in unexpected positions.This reminded me of another Supreme Court case pertaining to state tax issues, 2015’s Comptroller of Treasury of Md. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 4:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
Accordingly, the Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court's determination denying the separate motions of the appellants appearing separately to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them, with one bill of costs payable by the appellants appearing separately and filing separate briefs. * See O'Neil v Peekskill Faculty Assn., 120 AD2d 36 at 42 The decision is posted on the Internet at http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2020/2020_06090.htm [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 4:04 pm by Howard Friedman
 shall be adjudged guilty of a misdemeanor" and fined $100 or sentenced to 90 days in jail.The complaint (full text) in Carrick v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 4:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
Accordingly, the Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court's determination denying the separate motions of the appellants appearing separately to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them, with one bill of costs payable by the appellants appearing separately and filing separate briefs. * See O'Neil v Peekskill Faculty Assn., 120 AD2d 36 at 42 The decision is posted on the Internet at http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2020/2020_06090.htm [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 6:52 am by Andrew Hamm
A Daily Journal podcast features discussion with Peter Altman about Lucia v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:10 am
  Those adverse decisions were based on pre-Bauman Delaware state law, Sternberg v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 4:37 am by Peter J. Sluka
  Ultimately, the Appellate Division, Fourth Department held that Neil’s side deals were “null and void” (Kavanaugh v Kavanaugh, 200 AD3d 1568 [4th Dept 2021]). [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
Master Bell stated that he “thought long and hard about whether or not to strike out Ms O’Neill’s action in the light of this jurisprudence and came close to doing so” [46]. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 9:48 am by Neil Siegel and Robert Cooter
Selvin Professor of Law at Berkeley Law School, and Neil Siegel, Professor of Law and Political Science at Duke Law School. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 9:34 am
The judge suggested that such a change would create a "conflict between the proxy rules and fiduciary responsibilities under state law. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 8:13 am by Fred Yarger
He filed an amicus brief for the state in support of the church in Trinity Lutheran v. [read post]