Search for: "State v. Taylor" Results 801 - 820 of 3,051
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2010, 3:49 am
”* In contrast, in Kidwell v Transportation Communications Union, 946 F.2d. 283, the Circuit Court held that a union member employed in an agency shop does not have any right to object to his or her union's using part of a member's dues for activities unrelated to collective negotiations. ** Chapter 338 of the Laws of 2008 made the agency shop fee provisions for public employees setout in the Taylor Law [Civil Service Law Article 14] permanent for State… [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:55 am by Rory Little
Significantly, Justice Scalia begins by noting that the Court ruled twenty-five years ago in Taylor v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 7:20 pm by David Smyth
  The North Carolina state regulators issued a final administrative cease-and-desist order against Taylor and City Capital Corp., among others, on March 29th. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 3:00 am
on this.The dissents argue that accessory is a categorical CIMT because it is either a variation of fraud, and the precedent of the 9th would support this, or it is base and depraved to hide a felon.Brown v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 8:01 am by Georgetown Law Journal
Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 99.1 (November 2010) Articles The Wages of Stealth Overruling (With Particular Attention to Miranda v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 3:50 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Crocs Europe BV v Anderson & Anor (t/a Spectrum Agencies) [2012] EWCA Civ 1400 (30 October 2012) McCarrick v Hunter [2012] EWCA Civ 1399 (30 October 2012) Joyce v Epsom and Ewell Borough Council [2012] EWCA Civ 1398 (30 October 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Gregory v Benham [2012] EWHC 2971 (QB) (26 October 2012) Joseph & Ors v Spiller & Anor [2012] EWHC 2958 (QB) (26 October 2012) High Court… [read post]
18 May 2022, 2:07 pm by NARF
Taylor (Tribal Courts; Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act) Weiss v. [read post]
26 May 2013, 8:39 am by Howard Friedman
Governor of State of Washington, (9th Cir., May 22, 2013), the 9th Circuit dismissed under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine an inmate's claim that state court judges violated his free exercise rights by refusing to transfer his case to an ecclesiastical tribunal.In Phillips v. [read post]