Search for: "Stone v. Stone" Results 801 - 820 of 3,764
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2019, 4:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Inc., 27 NY3d 46, 56 [2016]; Scialdone v Stepping Stones Assoc., L.P., 148 AD3d 953, 954-955 [2017]; Klein v Metropolitan Child Servs., Inc., 100 AD3d 708, 711 [2012]; 42 USC § 1983; CPLR art 14-A). [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 5:15 am by Kevin
According to Rolling Stone, Newton and his family did not live at the property in 2017. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 2:00 am by Ben
There have been two major US decisions in the word of music and sound recordings with a win for Kraftwerk and a loss for Katy Perry, and in the background a third (the Led Zepplin "Stairway to Heaven" case waits for an upcoming an en banc appeal in the Ninth Circuit, and a fourth involving Ed Sheerhan in turn waiting for that decision (Sheerhan v Townsend) with Judge Louis L Stanton acknowledging that as the appeal judges will be considering some copyright technicalities that are… [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 11:46 pm by Helen Macpherson (AU)
ACCC v Birubi Art Pty Ltd (in liquidation) The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) commenced action against Birubi Art Pty Ltd (in liquidation) back in 2018 for making false claims that its tourists souvenirs, including didgeridoos, boomerangs, message stones and bull-roarers, all painted in Indigenous styles, were made in Australia and hand painted by Indigenous persons, when this was not the case. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 11:46 pm by Helen Macpherson (AU)
ACCC v Birubi Art Pty Ltd (in liquidation) The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) commenced action against Birubi Art Pty Ltd (in liquidation) back in 2018 for making false claims that its tourists souvenirs, including didgeridoos, boomerangs, message stones and bull-roarers, all painted in Indigenous styles, were made in Australia and hand painted by Indigenous persons, when this was not the case. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 1:42 am
The IPCom guidance are provided for readers' convenience at the end of this post.The IPCom factors have since been applied in Actavis v Pharmacia [2014] EWHC 2265 (stay was ordered), and Eli Lilly v Janssen Sciences [2016] EWHC 313 (stay was not ordered) (IPKat post here).David Stone (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge), applied the IPCom guidance to the fact of the case in Coloplast v Salts. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 9:04 am by Lovechilde
He and his administration are stone-walling legitimate attempts at Congressional oversight. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 9:04 am by Lovechilde
He and his administration are stone-walling legitimate attempts at Congressional oversight. [read post]