Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 801 - 820
of 14,807
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2011, 3:42 am
Strong On October 28, 2011, a dissenting opinion regarding the preliminary decision on jurisdiction and admissibility was issued in the ground-breaking case of Abaclat (formerly Beccara) v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 3:21 pm
The case, In re Monarch Consulting, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 4:02 am
All attorney representations are not equal, and a strong public policy of limiting the volume of legal malpractice cases is highlighted by Siemsen v Mevorach 2018 NY Slip Op 02821 Decided on April 25, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 9:05 pm
In its decision yesterday in Minnesota Voters Alliance v Mansky, the Supreme Court ruled that a Minnesota law banning political apparel at polls ran afoul of the First Amendment. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 2:26 am
At the date of the proceedings being issued in this case, there was a sufficiently strong probability that an injunction would be required to prevent Teva from infringing. [read post]
6 May 2013, 12:09 pm
But the case for implied preemption is strong. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 10:54 pm
alp judgment continues a strong tradition in European Court jurisprudence where freedom of expression prevails in cases of insult or defamation of heads of state, presidents or high ranking politicians (for example, Lingens v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
New York State’s Human Rights Law does not protect an employee from all retaliation, only from retaliation that results in an injury or harmNapierala v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 2016 NY Slip Op 04832, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentLisa Napierala challenged New York State Division of Human Rights’ [SDHR] determination of "no probable cause" with respect to her complaint that Erie Community College [ECC] had retaliated against… [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 12:00 pm
’” See Rales v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
Prima Paint Corp. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 5:05 pm
The state Supreme Court held in Attorney General v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 11:54 am
See Mortimer v. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 6:28 am
However, the state supreme court justices reversed. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 5:17 am
Provisions of the Bill were incorporated against the states with ridiculous casualness in cases like Gitlow and Cantwell v CT. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 8:05 am
In a 8-1 decision, the United States Supreme Court held in Rita v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 5:59 am
The Supreme Court declared it unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 8:50 am
Further, the state law claims implicate no federal interest yet California courts have a strong interest in enforcing state law labor claims, like those asserted by Plaintiff herein.See Weltman, 2009 U.S. [read post]
7 May 2023, 7:42 am
Padilla One More Time: Facebook Isn’t a State Actor–Atkinson v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 10:15 am
Since its 1943 decision Parker v. [read post]
