Search for: "United States v. Arenas" Results 801 - 820 of 924
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2022, 6:01 am by David A. Martin
It states that DHS “may return” a person “who arrives by land from a foreign territory contiguous to the United States” to that territory pending an immigration hearing. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:39 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
Twitter introduced a “country-withheld content” policy last January, stating that: “[m]any countries, including the United States, have laws that may apply to Tweets and/or Twitter account content. [read post]
Standard of ReviewTrial courts have always been afforded broad discretion in the granting of new trials, and may exercise such discretion “in the interests of justice and fairness” without stating any other reason. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:33 am by centerforartlaw
Article 7 urges a signatory state to prohibit the importation of illicitly transferred cultural property from another state while Article 9 allows a state whose cultural property is in jeopardy to request assistance from other states.[4] CPIA allows foreign states to enter into bilateral agreements (or Memorandum of Understanding) with the U.S., which entails an import restriction on cultural property of certain types and from certain periods. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
” The third category of the statute thus prefers people who are 65 or older, giving them an entitlement to early voting by mail that younger persons do not enjoy unless they satisfy additional criteria.Plaintiffs challenged this law as violative of the Twenty-Sixth Amendment of the Constitution, which provides—also quite straightforwardly—that “[t]he right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied… [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 1:31 am
  Surely, it will be argued, the United States is TRIPS-compliant as the leading proponent and creator of the TRIPS; hence, if eBay is the law of the United States, it presents a model of TRIPS-compliance for any country to follow. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 11:36 pm
Green uses the example of the decriminalization of sodomy in the United States. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:01 am
The administration and the country paid the price for that - and still are.On the other hand, I have been surprised and dismayed by the public vehemence with which some JAGs have fought the very idea of military commissions - highly invested, as Jack Goldsmith observes in his new book in the arena to which they are accustomed as criminal lawyers, the Uniform Code of Military Justice, and seeking and finding support among NGOs, military law groups, and other places outside the structure of… [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 8:17 am by Andrew Hamm
Most broadly, I argue that when we disagree over what the Constitution means in public schools, we engage in an argument that is fundamentally about what sort of nation we want the United States to be. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court has not reviewed a lobbyist registration case since 1954’s United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 9:28 pm by Kim Kirschenbaum
It has covered virtually every major government agency, from the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) to the U.S. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 pm
” [36] Courts look at whether the injuries to the spectator were foreseeable. [37] Along those same lines, those who sponsor sporting events owe their spectators and participants a limited duty of care. [38] Many states have adopted a limited-liability doctrine where defendants have a limited duty to maintain reasonable care in keeping their premises safe. [39] This is the reason why many sports facilities have screened or fenced off fields and arenas [40]. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 4:43 pm by Bernie Burk
  We ran into related issues during the pre-Obergefell litigation on marriage equality, when the United States Attorney General and some State Attorneys General declined to defend the constitutionality of marriage and marriage-related laws that were discriminatory, and other parties (generally representatives of legislative factions and state or local officials) stepped in to do so, with fairly limited success. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 2:31 pm by Pamela Wolf
For these and other reasons, 2014 may turn out to be a similarly notable year in the labor law arena. [read post]