Search for: "United States v. Edwards" Results 801 - 820 of 1,988
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2010, 4:30 am by INFORRM
Inforrm has approached leading American journalists for their views on the British Press and the differences in between journalism in the United States and journalism in the UK . [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 2:06 am
There are instructive parallels, he argues, between the imperialism of "old Europe" (not his phrase) and that of Japan, and of the United States. [read post]
Recently, the decisions of courts in the United Kingdom (UK) in Unwired Planet v Huawei Technologies (Unwired Planet) and Optis Cellular Technology v Apple (which followed the decision of the UK Supreme Court in Unwired Planet) have given rise to significant debate over the appropriate forum for litigation of disputes in relation to standard essential patents (SEPs). [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 8:30 am by Andrew Hamm
United States 20-291Issue: Whether the term “covered offense” in the First Step Act of 2018 includes violations of 21 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 3:00 am by SOG Staff
  The United States Supreme Court granted cert this week in Carpenter v. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 2:37 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
Against the background of recent investment disputes (Philip Morris v Uruguay and Philip Morris v Australia) and recent trade agreements with ISDS norms (the United States – Mexico – Canada Agreement, USMCA, and the EU/Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, CETA), this chapter addresses the impact of ISDS on public health regulation.In Chapter 7, the author discusses how the US shaped the provisions on geographical indications in TPP-11. [read post]
10 May 2012, 1:14 pm by WSLL
CiteID=465579Certified Question from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, The Honorable William C. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 10:26 am by Ruthann Robson
  Lane is not the only one to argue that the Eleventh Circuit’s categorical exclusion of First Amendment protection for subpoenaed testimony is incorrect:  the Solicitor General, representing the United States as an amicus, agrees with him. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 11:25 am
Allied Stores Int’l, Inc., as well as by the United States Supreme Court’s 1980 decision in Pruneyard Shopping Center v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 6:50 am by Dennis Crouch
Alcon Lensx, Inc., No. 16-48 (limits on arbitrator autonomy in patent cases) Interference: Edward Tobinick v. [read post]