Search for: "United States v. Judge"
Results 801 - 820
of 32,263
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2014, 4:00 am
The State’s reduction of its employer contribution for health insurance premiums for judges was an unconstitutional diminution of judicial compensationBransten v State of New York, 2014 NY Slip Op 03214, Appellate Division, First DepartmentSitting and retired members of the New York State Judiciary challenged the State’s recent decrease in its employer contribution to the cost of the judges' health insurance premiums,… [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 12:19 pm
The United States Trustee Program (USTP) was created under The Bankruptcy Judges, United States Trustees and Family Farmer Bankruptcy Act of 1986. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 10:08 pm
A release posted today by the Clerk of the USDC in Indianapolis announces:The United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana announced today the selection of Debra McVicker Lynch for the position of United States Magistrate Judge. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 5:46 am
Hawaii, which upheld Donald Trump's anti-Muslim travel ban, and Citizens United v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 7:39 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 11:23 am
It largely adopts the reasoning of United States v. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
Colvin, December 16, 2015, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit More Blog Entries:Hanson v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 5:11 pm
See United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 5:38 am
Dudas to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
22 May 2012, 3:40 am
United States, ___A.3d ___, ___ (D.C. 2012). [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 9:16 pm
McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 8:49 am
United States). [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:46 am
Take, for example, the case of United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 11:46 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 2:27 am
See United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 9:54 am
United States and Kimbrough v. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 12:00 pm
Wilkie case was heard at the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit by a full panel of judges (en banc) and that means it has precedential effect (it can be used as law and binding on future issues). [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 10:10 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 11:58 am
Earlier today, the United State Supreme Court ruled that federal judges may not impose or lengthen a defendant’s sentence in order to promote rehabilitation. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 7:42 pm
Earlier today, the United State Supreme Court ruled that federal judges may not impose or lengthen a defendant’s sentence in order to promote rehabilitation. [read post]
