Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 801 - 820
of 10,388
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2014, 5:13 am
Briefly: In the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh previews next week’s oral argument in Yates v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:01 am
In the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh analyzes the Court’s recent decision in Luis v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 3:23 am
Dollar Financial Group, Inc., Cancellation No. 920608880 [Petition for cancellation of registrations for the mark MONEY MART in standard character form for loan financing, check cashing services, not including pawn shop services, and for the mark in design form (below) for pawn shop and pawn brokerage services, based on fraud and on Section 2(d) priority and likelihood of confusion with the identical mark allegedly used by petitioner for pawn services].September 22, 2020 -… [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 10:13 am
” Monasky v. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 10:41 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
The decisionThe IPO’s decision focused on the words of section 3(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1994, which states that “trade marks which are devoid of any distinctive character” -- an absolute bar to registration that comes from Article 3(1)(b) of the Trade Mark Directive and is paralleled in Article 7(1)(b) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation.The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Case C-37/03 BioID v OHIM… [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 4:50 am
This article focuses on the patent marking requirements for the United States. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 5:22 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 9:48 am
The most famous derby in the United States is the Kentucky Derby, but the word traces its roots to a 1780 race in England. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 3:21 am
[Section 2(d) refusals to register the mark ECLIPSE for various goods relating to motion pictures and entertainment, in classes 9, 14, 18, 24, and 25, in view of, respectively, several class 9 registrations for the identical mark, a registration of the identical mark for watches in class 14, three registration in class 18 for ECLIPSE, ECLIPZE, and ECLIPS & Design, a class 24 registration of ECLIPSE for curtains, and a class 25 registration of the identical… [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 9:02 pm
By Mark SpringIn 2005, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in Smith v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 8:28 am
The January 21 letter marked a turning point for Norene. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 5:32 am
Case date: 12 January 2023 Case number: No. 19-13390 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
11 May 2018, 3:17 am
Tommie Copper IP, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 9:30 am
Clarence Earl Gideon March 18, 1963, was the date on which the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of a petitioner who was also a Florida convict. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:30 am
The third case, United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 3:30 am
"Joneca believed that another company had prior rights to the mark in the United states, and when that company let its U.S. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Dist. v Yonkers Fedn. of Teachers, 180 AD3d 1041, 1042 [2020] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Dist. v Yonkers Fedn. of Teachers, 180 AD3d 1041, 1042 [2020] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 3:56 am
Sony Group Corporation v. [read post]
