Search for: "United States v. Rodriguez"
Results 801 - 820
of 1,094
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2012, 12:35 pm
Castrillon agreed to organize the smuggling of 100 kilos of marijuana, worth $70,000 to $100,000, from Tijuana to the United States. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 12:18 pm
§ 2253(c)(2); and (3) whether Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 11:15 am
Rodriguez, 628 F.3d 1258, (11th Cir. 2010)); and a recruiter in California who downloaded customer lists to start a competing business (United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 4:09 am
In Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 3:03 pm
In the first issue, the defendant argued that Trooper Bivens had unlawfully prolonged the traffic stop, invoking the Supreme Court’s decision in Rodriguez v. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 6:14 pm
United Airlines (9th Cir. 1999) 166 F.3d 1272, 1278; Garibaldi v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
Co. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 12:30 pm
” Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 4:18 am
United States, which asks whether the residual clause of the career-offender sentencing guideline is unconstitutionally vague, and Jennings v. [read post]
7 May 2025, 2:27 pm
V; see Plyler v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 4:33 am
Monday’s argument agenda also included State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
In the most recent case on the topic, Rodriguez v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 2:00 am
Have you read the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 2:00 am
Have you read the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 8:31 am
United States, 16-9649, Richter v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 1:30 pm
” Steele v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 1:02 pm
Rodriguez and Heck v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:33 am
Dodd, 598 F.3d 449, 452–53 (U.S.Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit 2010)); see also United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2016, 12:00 am
Calixto-Rodriguez, U.S. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
The Anti-SLAPP Law The anti-SLAPP law provides that "[a] cause of action against a person arising from any act of that person in furtherance of the person's right of petition or free speech under the United States or California Constitution in connection with a public issue shall be subject to a special motion to strike, unless the court determines that the plaintiff has established that there is a probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim. [read post]
