Search for: "United States v. State of Wash." Results 801 - 820 of 1,390
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2012, 11:47 am by William Carleton
By contrast, minimum wage laws have a remedial purpose of protecting against “‘the evils and dangers resulting from wages too low to buy the bare necessities of life and from long hours of work injurious to health,’” United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 1:00 pm by Ted Folkman
On the one hand, the First Circuit’s decision in Cusumano v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 7:24 am by Greg Ablavsky
(I haven't read all the amici, so it's possible others made a historical argument; the United States did not in its brief, apart from a couple citiations to the Federalist). [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am by Blog  Editorial
  In relation to control, no material difference as regards the position of the state. 15.07: Thomas de la Mare QC takes the Court through the cases of Barnado and Mallin v Clark. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 6:04 pm by George Washington Law Review
Rev. 1174 (2012) [PDF] Matthew Radler, Privacy Is the Problem: United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm by dirklasater
”1 Aside from the granular problems stated above, and recognizing that the proposed amendments would in fact add to the problem astutely noted in the quote above by Lawrence Lessig, there is a global, more systemic conflict at issue within the realm of copyright enforcement litigation deserving mention. [read post]