Search for: "W. D." Results 801 - 820 of 13,752
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Although the number of securities lawsuits filed this year remained steady compared to 2021, we have seen many notable developments in securities law. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
G.G., 2023 QCCA 305Juridiction : Cour d’appel (C.A.), MontréalDécision de : Juges Stephen W. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 9:35 am by Rechtsanwalt Martin Steiger
Es würde genügen, den einschlägigen Absatz 3 in Artikel 6 der Notverordnung ersatzlos zu streichen. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 8:26 am
Erik Yacko, Opposition No. 91263787 (March 17, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 6:14 am by Dan Bressler
” “And in the petition for writ of prohibition, multiple attorneys at Akerman, including Nancy W. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 5:30 am by Quinta Jurecic
Notably, Schiff (D-Calif.) himself has suggested some dissatisfaction with the report’s focus on Trump, hinting at some of what might have been left out of the final document in the name of consensus. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
Here are three recent appeals from Section 2(d) refusals. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 5:01 am by Ms. Constitution
The issue was that in 1921, Reza Khan, commander of the Persian Cossack Brigade, staged a coup d’état and subsequently induced the parliament to unconstitutionally proclaim itself a constituent assembly and proclaim Reza Khan as the king of Pahlavi. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:44 am by Edgar (aka MrConsumer)
Thanks to Joan D. and James M. for raising this issue. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Sixth Circuit (unpublished): "[W]e are troubled by the timing of Baker's federal prosecution following his state-law pardon, and by the impression that Baker may not have received such a lengthy federal sentence but for his acceptance of a state-law pardon," which we hope is some comfort to Baker as we affirm his sentence in all respects. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 11:59 am by Eugene Volokh
Romanick, written by Chief Justice Jon Jensen, joined by Justices Daniel Crothers and Lisa Fair McEvers, and by District Judge Daniel Narum, sitting by designation (in place of Justice Douglas Bahr, who was recused): [W]e conclude RRWC has a substantial likelihood in establishing there is a fundamental right for a woman to obtain an abortion in instances where it is necessary to preserve her life or health. [read post]