Search for: "Wells v. Heard*"
Results 801 - 820
of 9,160
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2014, 10:49 am
The case is is Occidental Permian Ltd. v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 3:21 am
The DDR Holdings v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 8:43 am
Having been involved in the recent Actavis v Lilly Supreme Court case, and indeed some of the earlier leading decisions as well, Andrew will take participants through the history and implications of Actavis v Lilly and lead the debate: Actavis, interpretation and file wrapper – what do we do now? [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 2:00 am
At 11:00 AM (EST) arguments in U.S. v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 5:00 am
*Citing Paul v NYC Department of Education, 146 AD3d 705, the Appellate Division, rejecting Coach's contention that hearsay testimony should not have been admitted at the hearing, holding that the hearing officer "was entitled to rely on hearsay" in sustaining the U-Rating give Coach. * In Gray v Adduci, 73 NY2d 741, the Court of Appeals said that it was well established that "hearsay evidence can be the basis of an administrative determination. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 11:06 am
Spieker is an Intellectual Property Attorney in the MVS Biotechnology & Chemical Practice Group as well as the Mechanical and Electrical Practice Group. [read post]
7 May 2012, 10:37 am
Well, it hasn’t been a good week for the reputation of the legal profession. [read post]
7 May 2012, 10:37 am
Well, it hasn’t been a good week for the reputation of the legal profession. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 8:26 am
First of the day, Thacker v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 5:40 am
(“Twitter”) won a publicised trade mark opposition action against a Singapore-founded tech start-up, V V Technology Pte Ltd (“V V”). [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 7:20 am
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on two consolidated cases, Florence v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 7:20 am
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on two consolidated cases, Florence v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 6:05 pm
" Well, I don't. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 3:39 am
The 2017 trial saw the joined claims of Illumina & Sequenom (& Ors) v Premaitha and Illumina & Sequenom v Ariosa (& Ors). [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 1:18 pm
I thought it was a very well-run hearing and thought the opponents of the measure made a particularly powerful case. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 11:16 am
Wyers v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 10:20 am
Listen to: Morgan (Estate) v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 4:07 pm
On 16 June 2015, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights handed down its much-anticipated judgment in the Delfi AS v Estonia case. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:52 am
Valladolid, Greene v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:06 am
In Guangzhou Dockyards Co Ltd v ENE Aegialii [2010] EWHC 2826 (Comm), the High Court recently upheld the well-established principle that under English law, appeals against arbitral awards cannot be made on issues of fact. [read post]
