Search for: "Day v. United States" Results 8181 - 8200 of 25,654
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
June 12 should be civil rights holiday, a great day for Americans, a great day for love, and a valentine to the Lovings. [read post]
25 Dec 2013, 6:16 am
[Lykins] also agreed to ‘”submit his person, residence and curtilage, office or vehicle to a search, upon direction and discretion of the United States Probation Office. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, "Due process requires that the * * * hearing be open to the press and public" [See Fitzgerald v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, "Due process requires that the * * * hearing be open to the press and public" [See Fitzgerald v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 4:05 am by Tom Merrill
United States, 459 U.S. 131 (1982), the Supreme Court held that when an agency issues sequential decisions, reversal by a court of a later decision does not automatically reinstate an earlier one. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 6:00 am by Trevor Cutaiar
United States District Court Judge Lance Africk recently addressed an interesting timing issue in connection with an employer’s McCorpen defense. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:56 am
"Ample art" was the ridiculous phrase used by the pool reporter to describe the room Sarah Jessica Parker had had prepped to receive the President of the United States and 50 of his glamorous friends. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 5:19 am by Susan Brenner
Christine Wright–Darrisaw, against the President of the United States. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 6:02 pm by Josh Blackman
Last year, the January 6 committee requested certain documents from the Archivist of the United States. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 9:57 pm by Florian Mueller
Chen of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California apparently got the same impression, which is why he set a TRO hearing (to be conducted via Zoom) for Monday, August 24:"CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING HEARING AND BRIEFING FOR [17] MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER: Hearing re: [17] MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause Why Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue and Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support… [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 8:23 am by Kurt Lash
Privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States are not the same thing as privileges and immunities of citizens in the several states. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 4:36 pm by Steven Calabresi
Beyond that, the man should be allowed to fade into history and the United States should move on. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 8:25 am by Florian Mueller
That day is going to be (at least) doubly eventful from a FOSS Patents perspective as the Mannheim Regional Court will hold the first Ericsson v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 8:33 am by Andrew Hamm
United States, in which the justices ruled that co-conspirators who do not benefit personally from illegal proceeds cannot be ordered to forfeit property. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 1:41 pm
United States, 546 U.S. 12 (2005) makes this rule non-jurisdictional. [read post]
1 May 2007, 12:25 pm
International and United States law prohibits the discharge of waste containing more than 15 parts per million oil without treatment by an oil water separator and oil sensing equipment. [read post]