Search for: "People v Justice A."
Results 8181 - 8200
of 23,099
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2024, 6:00 am
In City of Grants Pass, Oregon v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 2:28 am
The question in U.S. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 4:38 am
The five who voted for Texas (and the chief justice) were placed on the court by Republican presidents who ran on a party platform that called for the appointment of judges who would overturn Roe v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 6:55 pm
Earlier this year the Supreme Court examined the responsibility to appoint counsel in the Texas case Rothgery v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 5:05 am
A decision in 1939, United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 12:36 am
Under Terry v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 4:55 am
Perhaps the best known of these was the Supreme Court’s decision in Obgerfell v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 9:33 pm
Justice Binnie of the Supreme Court of Canada in 2004 decision of R. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 11:34 am
As a Supreme Court Justice, he participated in many important cases, including Hayburn’s Case, Chisholm v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 4:00 am
The analogy may be offensive to some, but I think it captures a part of what is wrong with Justice Samuel Alito's (SA's) leaked opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 4:26 pm
The Government invokes Justice Holmes' observation in Schenck v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 4:54 am
One such case out of Iowa, State v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 12:01 am
People v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm
There never was any doubt that the question of whether the infringement of a single design patent by a complex, multifunctional product warrants an unapportioned disgorgement of profits would be an extraordinarily important one. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 12:31 pm
Prior to the 2000 Supreme Court decision in Mitchell v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:47 am
This was reiterated in the Supreme Court’s opinion in Fisher v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:47 am
This was reiterated in the Supreme Court’s opinion in Fisher v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 7:57 am
People who are neither criminals nor apologists for criminals might want to consider that when casting their own votes.* See, e.g., Hayden v. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 11:29 am
US v. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 12:05 pm
The Department of Homeland Security, too, has focused its surveillance authorities on political and other constitutionally-protected speech, as well as activities far outside its homeland security mandate, including those of: journalists, racial justice demonstrators in the wake of George Floyd’s murder, and people simply reacting online to the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
