Search for: "State v. Favors"
Results 8181 - 8200
of 37,549
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2010, 4:01 am
Sometimes, the highest court in the State answers the questions, and sometimes its the lowly Civil Court. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 2:45 pm
Weisler & State v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 9:53 am
In a 5-4 decision, the United States Supreme Court held in Georgia et al v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 9:53 am
In a 5-4 decision, the United States Supreme Court held in Georgia et al v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:30 am
Wrote Stephanie Menciner:In both the DC Circuit and the 6th Circuit, the two appellate courts that have upheld the health care law, judges relied heavily on a 2005 Supreme Court ruling in Gonzalez v. [read post]
7 Sep 2006, 1:51 pm
The Court held in favor of the Commission. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 1:06 pm
Such is the case here in Solis v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:26 am
Establishing a right to General Municipal Law Section 207-c benefitsWhite v County of Cortland, 283 AD2d 826, affirmed, 97 NY2d 336 In the White case the Appellate Division, Third Department, set out a basic principal it follows in determining if an individual is eligible for disability benefits under General Municipal Law Section 207-c as follows: Section 207-c is a remedial statute and thus is to be liberally construed in favor of the claimant. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 7:26 pm
In Amburgy v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am
We favor original public meaning originalism. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm
Groff v. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 8:47 am
Other Patent Victories: Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 8:14 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 6:32 am
In Fahrenholz v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 2:00 am
Wilcox v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 2:00 am
Wilcox v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 2:41 pm
See Phillips v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 5:38 am
[the plaintiff's] favor. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 2:45 pm
Case in point — did anyone think the Chief Justice would rule in favor of Obamacare? [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 6:26 am
Under United States v. [read post]
