Search for: "State v. Force" Results 8181 - 8200 of 32,554
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2019, 7:56 am by Joseph J. Lazzarotti
In an effort that largely began with establishing a task force in 2014, the NAIC adopted a Data Security Model Law in November 2017. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 7:47 am by Chris Attig
”  So begins an August 2017 report from the National Task Force on Lawyer Well-Being. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 7:47 am by Chris Attig
”  So begins an August 2017 report from the National Task Force on Lawyer Well-Being. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 7:47 am by Chris Attig
”  So begins an August 2017 report from the National Task Force on Lawyer Well-Being. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 4:57 am by Jeff Nowak
§ 825.124(b) In finding that IEP meetings are covered by the FMLA, the DOL leaned heavily on: 1) a 2012 federal court case, Wegelin v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 10:17 am by Vishnu Kannan
In response to the Indian government’s decision to revoke Kashmir’s special status under the Indian constitution, protests broke out across the disputed state, the New York Times reports. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 7:37 am
The legally binding nature of this document depends not on the words used for its name (Legally Binding Instrument...), but on whether the document will obtain the minimum number of ratifications required to enter into force. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 7:15 am
In return, families saw themselves separated and dispersed across the United States and several countries. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
The Court found that Regulation 3 does not carry the force of law (see Weiss v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 7:30 pm by Caleb Skeath and B.J. Altvater
New Data Security Provisions under SHIELD Act Once it enters into force on March 21, 2020, the SHIELD Act will require any person or business that owns or licenses “private information” of New York residents to develop, implement, and maintain “reasonable safeguards” to protect the information. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 12:43 am
PatentsIn Takeda v Roche: "Is it plausible? [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 9:39 am by Steve Gottlieb
It was reported recently that the current Administration is trying to eliminate so-called disparate impact cases under the Fair Housing Act.[1] The press reported it as forcing plaintiffs to prove intent to discriminate. [read post]