Search for: "Study v. State" Results 8181 - 8200 of 15,013
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2014, 6:38 am by Benjamin Bissell
Wells promised that while he could not personally attend a two-day pre-trial hearing in the case of United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 5:44 am
 Yet, their optional nature allows Member States to determine the actual shape and scope of any given resulting national exception. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 11:50 am
Previously, the state adhered to the Frye standard, which was established by the 1923 case of Frye v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 2:32 pm by admin
For example, the new draft Bulletin states: “Where there is a board of directors, it should be involved in the appointment of the compliance officer and endorse the company’s compliance program. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 11:17 am
Ever since the FDA decided that discretion was the better part of valor – or read the handwriting on the wall – and decided not to appeal United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:37 am by Kevin LaCroix
Although I try to include on this blog topics involving issues from outside the United States, because of my background and experience, U.S-related topics tend to predominate. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:00 am by John Gregory
The rights to reproduce copyright work can be complex, involving study and criticism and fair use. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 9:24 am
 Is the Hospira v Genentech case justthe first of many biosimilar cases to come before the English Court? [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 5:24 pm by John C. Manoog III
Related Blog Posts Massachusetts Transvaginal Mesh Lawsuit Moves Forward Patient in Unsuccessful Clinical Trial Stated a Claim under Massachusetts Law for Negligence as to Trial Sponsor’s Drafting of Consent Form – Zeman v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 11:24 am by Benjamin Bissell
At Foreign Policy, James Stavridis, the former supreme allied commander of NATO, has 7 pieces of advice for creating a durable confederation of states. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 4:21 am by Terry Hart
This was also the same time that the Copyright Office released a study on fair use as part of the revision process that would eventually result in the 1976 Copyright Act. [read post]