Search for: "United States v. Close"
Results 8181 - 8200
of 14,200
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2014, 6:37 am
These are known as Terry stops, after the United States Supreme Court case that authorized these investigatory stops. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 9:47 am
On February 11th, the three private plaintiff-appellants and eleven State plaintiff-appellants in State National Bank of Big Spring, et al. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
And given the very recent ruling in United States ex rel. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 3:32 pm
Illinois is apparently unique among the states in allowing condominium boards to file actions under the state Forcible Entry Act. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:51 pm
Last year, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decided largely in favour of Mr. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 10:53 am
Again, the strong reliance on those requirements is a bold move; the argument on this point closely resembles the argument that the United States presented in Mayo to no avail. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 4:25 am
And so the government came down so hard on her that even the 7th Circuit dissenter in United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 5:11 pm
Olsen The United States Supreme Court declined to review the Second Circuit’s decision in Irizarry v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 4:38 pm
Howard Bashman (How Appealing) points to today’s Seventh Circuit opinion United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 7:42 am
Clark v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 9:07 am
By Aaron Olsen The United States Supreme Court declined to review the Second Circuit’s decision in Irizarry v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 8:07 am
By Aaron Olsen The United States Supreme Court declined to review the Second Circuit’s decision in Irizarry v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 2:13 pm
In the United States, the Supreme Court recognized the relationship between anonymity and freedom of speech and association in NAACP v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 4:18 am
Last September, I noted the case of Dunlap v. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 11:14 am
The Canadian court held that risk sufficed, and it went further, contrary to the majority of courts in the United States, to hold that a 40% reduction in risk sufficed to satisfy the more-likely-than-not standard. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 10:02 am
In a November, 2013 decision published on March 10th of this year, in what appears to be the first decision of its kind not only in New Jersey but in the United States, a Superior Court judge in the matter of Plotnick v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 6:25 pm
First, Cisco is an American company with offices throughout the United States, including in this state. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 12:22 pm
Under current law, as confirmed by the United States Supreme Court in the Pliva v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 10:03 am
This would almost certainly never occur in the United States. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 9:14 am
I should add, in the interest of candor, that I worked on the brief and presented oral argument on behalf of the United States in Dewsnup v. [read post]
