Search for: "State v. Save" Results 8201 - 8220 of 11,765
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2021, 12:00 am by Jason Kelley
California EFF Blog Post: State v Burch EFF Amicus in State v Burch  New Jersey’s State v Carty Minnesota’s State v Fort Other Resources Harlan Yu of Upturn EFF Blog Post: So-called “Consent Searches” Harm Our Digital Rights 2020 Upturn report on law enforcement searching mobile phones  2020 Upturn written testimony to DC Council on police budget and surveillance technologies  EFF Blog… [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:00 am by Eden Winlow (Bristows)
It enables real-world effects such as power saving, information reduction and a reduction in complexity of the system. [read post]
26 May 2021, 2:22 pm by Giles Peaker
And then there was Del Rio Sanchez v Simple Properties Management Limited. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:41 am by Ron Coleman
IMatthew David Brozik blogged here about Tiffany v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 8:55 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The departure from the American approach appears to have occurred as early as in 1875 in United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 6:58 am by Adam Feldman
First, the fact that the governing majority in a State has traditionally viewed a particular practice as immoral is not a sufficient reason for upholding a law prohibiting the practice; neither history nor tradition could save a law prohibiting miscegenation from constitutional attack. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 3:23 pm by Lucy Reed
X v UK is inconsistent with other more persuasive authorities like Airey v Ireland, Steel & Morris v UK (2005) 41 EHRR 22,  and W v UK (1988) 10 EHRR 29 which, significantly, is a family law authority. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:59 am by SHG
Murphy said repeatedly he didn’t believe the testimony Officer Thomas V. [read post]
10 Oct 2024, 6:45 am by Dan Bressler
The software recording the video meeting had been configured to automatically save a copy to the company’s public server. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 9:02 pm by Anita Ramasastry
Supreme Court addressed student speech more than 40 years ago in Tinker v. [read post]