Search for: "Test Plaintiff" Results 8201 - 8220 of 21,967
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2017, 7:18 am by Mark Hartsoe
Instead, the court ruled that, in such a situation, the trial court has the discretion to conduct a balancing test under Tennessee Rule of Evidence 403 to determine whether the probative value of the evidence is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 6:12 am by Russell Jackson
The defendant had numerous arguments for why there was no commonality or predominance, and why plaintiffs failed the typicality and adequacy of representation tests. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 11:51 am by Teresa Boyle-Vellucci
  Despite such clearance, the defendant required her to participate in a “functional capacity evaluation test,” to assess her ability to, for example, lift certain objects and move in certain ways. [read post]
16 May 2011, 6:32 am by Daniel O'Rielly
 Nevertheless, the Court interpreted this Dodd-Frank provision as a conflict preemption test. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 12:57 pm by Edward A. Fallone
Therefore, the plaintiffs failed in their facial challenge to the Indiana Voter ID law. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 5:54 pm by John Hochfelder
During surgery, though, a somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) test was abnormal, indicating that the spinal cord had become dysfunctional. [read post]
13 May 2022, 8:13 am by Edward T. Kang and Ryan T. Kirk
The fourth prong of the Miners test, requiring that the plaintiff be an involuntary creditor, was discussed at length in both Mortimer and Seven Springs. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am by Schachtman
Mass. 1986)(granting summary judgment), aff’d, 830 F.2d 1190, 1197 (1st Cir. 1987)(distinguishing between chances that “somewhat favor” plaintiff and plaintiff’s burden of showing specific causation by “preponderant evidence”) DeLuca v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 6:25 pm by Jeralyn
While it was DEA polygraphers who administered the tests, it was Defendant Metropolitan which coordinated the testing; scheduled the tests; communicated with the employees regarding the tests; presented the order in which the tests would be given; and discharged the employees after they “failed” or refused the test or had inconclusive test results. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 6:36 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Iowa’s private-employer drug-testing law, Iowa Code § 730.5., requires that an employer conducting a drug test must obtain a sufficient quantity of the sample to allow for both the employer’s testing and a potential second, independent confirmatory test. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 8:11 am by Moseley Collins
Rptr. 3d 277, which reasoned the test for exclusive control has become one of right of control rather than actual control, and a plaintiff need not identify the particular negligent person or the particular instrumentality that cause his or her injuries. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 3:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Flomenhaft v Finkelstein (127 AD3d 634, 637 [1st Dept 2015] [test of pertinence is “extremely liberal”] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 7:26 am by Goldberg Segalla LLP
  Indeed, the plaintiffs assert that the pipeline failed during a hydrostatic test at 756 psi, rupturing in several places and causing the pipeline to twist and coil over the marsh, damaging wetlands and bottom water. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 10:46 am by Benjamin Cain
  “Federal regulators supervising the recall determined that the patch eliminated the vulnerability[, and] [o]ther than the Jeep in the Wired test, no other Chrysler vehicle has been successfully hacked. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 11:45 am by Steven G. Pearl
Second, the class action waiver is unconscionable under California law because it satisfies the Discovery Bank test, and California has a materially greater interest than Texas in applying its own law. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 1:17 pm by WIMS
However, they still must demonstrate an injury-in-fact to a legally protected interest that is actual or imminent and that satisfies the other prongs of the constitutional standing test. [read post]