Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 8221 - 8240
of 29,607
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2019, 4:08 am
” (That case, Gill v. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 12:08 pm
United States. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 9:46 am
Hayes v. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 7:22 am
I have been worried about the lawfulness of what social workers are doing for some time, and the low levels of awareness of the potential legal issues - hence my plan to write this post. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 9:54 am
The New Jersey Appellate division case of Fattore v Fattore discusses the various issues that can arise with military retirement and divorce. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 5:50 pm
He stated he took a full-strength aspirin tablet (325 mg) every day but was not on any other blood thinners. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 1:29 pm
The Supreme Court affirmed as much in its 2015 decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 12:53 pm
Vermont has since notified CMS that the state will not implement the state plan containing a work requirement. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 9:00 am
The ancillary services can’t be separately billed to these federal health care plans. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 7:41 am
Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 6:31 am
On January 23, 2019, the New Jersey Appellate Division issued an unpublished decision in 212 Marin Boulevard, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 5:22 am
The plan would go into effect only when enough states had signed on to add up to at least 270 votes (the minimum needed to win in the Electoral College). [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 2:43 am
Emmert v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 1:05 am
In a subsequent case, (R (Goloshvili) v Secretary of State [2019]), a landlord was issued with a Notice of Letting to Disqualified Person and was warned that if they did not evict the tenant they could “face an unlimited fine or be sent to prison for up to five years. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 12:37 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 6:54 am
In 1986, in a case called Batson v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 6:00 pm
This post will review the court’s opinion in State v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 8:43 am
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., 18-8 Issues: (1) Whether a state may require health-care facilities to dispose of fetal remains in the same manner as other human remains, i.e., by burial or cremation; and (2) whether a state may prohibit abortions motivated solely by the race, sex or disability of the fetus and require abortion doctors to inform patients of the prohibition. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of DeLuca v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 48 AD3d 876, the Appellate Division explained that "[I]t is the Comptroller's duty to determine retirement service credits and his determination will be upheld by this Court if rational and supported by substantial evidence" and it is the claimant's burden to show that he or she is entitled to additional retirement member service credit.According to the decision, Petitioner had… [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of DeLuca v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 48 AD3d 876, the Appellate Division explained that "[I]t is the Comptroller's duty to determine retirement service credits and his determination will be upheld by this Court if rational and supported by substantial evidence" and it is the claimant's burden to show that he or she is entitled to additional retirement member service credit.According to the decision, Petitioner had… [read post]
