Search for: "United States v. Circuit Judges" Results 8221 - 8240 of 16,272
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2014, 4:34 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Citing the infamous Dred Scott decision and Loving v Virginia, a circuit court judge in Little Rock, Arkansas last Friday continued an unbroken procession of states to strike down state law bans on same-sex marriage. [read post]
13 May 2014, 7:50 pm by Lyle Denniston
  And, like the others, she relied to a considerable degree on the reasoning of the Supreme Court last June in United States v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 10:21 am by Lyle Denniston
” In reciting the legal reasons in favor of a “conditional” stay of any decision by Judge Dale against the Idaho ban, the governor’s attorneys read the Supreme Court’s decision last June in the case of United States v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:49 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The State of Arkansas is appealing a May 9, 2014 decision of Circuit Court Judge Christopher Charles Piazza that if not overturned, makes Arkansas the latest state forced to recognize same-sex marriage. [read post]
12 May 2014, 8:29 am by Ben Rubin
Department of Agriculture holding that California raisin handlers could assert a takings claim as an affirmative defense to an enforcement action filed by the United States. [read post]
10 May 2014, 6:33 pm by Mark Summerfield
On 9 May 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued its opinion in Oracle America, Inc v Google Inc. [read post]
8 May 2014, 11:21 pm by Florian Mueller
In post-trial motions and on appeal, we will ask the judge and the federal circuit to cut the 6% verdict to 0, which is where it should end. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:00 am by Yishai Schwartz
When Ralls filed suit alleging violations of due process and the Administrative Procedure Act, President Obama himself issued a similar order demanding that Ralls divest and stating that he had “credible evidence” that Ralls’ actions might “impair the national security of the United States. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:09 am by Kevin LaCroix
The court said that the allegation that a shareholder placed a buy order in the United States that was then executed outside the U.S. does not “standing alone” establish that the shareholder “incurred irrevocable liability in the United States. [read post]
6 May 2014, 7:00 am by Peter Margulies
  Justice Stevens recognized, as the Court had indicated in the 1955 case of United States ex rel. [read post]
5 May 2014, 8:52 am by Dennis Crouch
The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit for further consideration in light of Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]