Search for: "Application of United States"
Results 8241 - 8260
of 58,003
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2011, 5:40 am
The district court granted the motion because the plaintiff's patents did not qualify as patentable subject matter under the machine-or-transformation, which the United States Supreme Court has recently determine remains a useful test in determining patentable subject matter. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 3:54 am
In August 2007, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (Office) published a notice proposing to revise the rules of practice pertaining to any claim using alternative language to claim two or more independent and distinct inventions (Alternative Claims Notice of Proposed Rule Making). [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 6:09 am
Here are the materials in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:17 am
Applicants for Permanent Residence currently in the United States who have applied, or will apply for adjustment of status. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 8:45 pm
DudasUndersecretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property andDirector of the United States Patent and Trademark OfficeCommissioner for PatentsThe Honorable Carlos M. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 7:58 pm
It’s a good one, because it indicates the questioner knows that in the United States, a party acquires a trademark through use, not registration. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:23 pm
In a 5-4 opinion written by Justice Kennedy, the United States Supreme today held in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 2:39 pm
Including this settlement, the United States has now recovered over $41 million in connection with this investigation. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 1:29 pm
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 7:42 am
The United States Congress rejected the opportunity to pass new legislation to prohibit the practice. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 7:16 pm
When she came to the United States, she was only 3 years old. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 10:56 am
On March 4, 2019, in a long-awaited decision, Justice Ginsberg delivered the unanimous opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 8:21 am
United States, the diplomatic-note practice caused confusion during oral argument because the United States (the respondent) had transmitted a diplomatic note to the court from Japan, which supported Zenith Radio (the petitioner). [read post]
25 May 2010, 7:20 am
(United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit, May 13, 2010)This environmental coverage dispute resulted from a fire loss at a building owned by the policyholder. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 6:33 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:45 am
Coming soon… Max Mosley v United Kingdom. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 6:43 pm
., United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 8:48 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:47 am
United States that criminal defendants should be allowed to use untainted assets; that is, assets unrelated to their alleged crimes, to pay for their criminal defense. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 3:44 pm
That is why the United States court of law is ever determined to make the law applicable to everyone and every possible case there is. [read post]
