Search for: "Bodie v Bodie"
Results 8241 - 8260
of 21,354
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2016, 12:46 am
Our Katonomist explains the implications of attacks on innovation.* Will a virtual body be granting the future Unitary SPCs? [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 3:57 pm
Expressing frustration at two examples - Apple v Kodak and Broadcom v Qualcomm. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 11:33 am
Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 8:27 am
I recently had the privilege of speaking about the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) at the Fordham 24th Annual Intellectual Property Law and Policy Conference, a stellar international IP conference. [read post]
16 Apr 2016, 5:39 pm
The Center for Powell Crossing, LLC v City of Powell, 2016 WL 1165355 (SD OH 3/25/2016)Filed under: Comprehensive Plan, Current Caselaw, Due Process, Takings [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 8:00 am
Cotter v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 6:44 am
Over forty years ago, it insists, the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 2:17 pm
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Visual body cavity search A jury sitting in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County convicted Kevin Eugene Mack on charges of possession of marijuana, possession of cocaine, and possession with intent to distribute cocaine. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 11:32 am
Such was the human tissue case Kennedy-McInnis v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 10:37 am
On Tuesday, the latest decision from Mr Justice Arnold in American Science & Engineering Inc v Rapiscan Systems Limited [2016] EWHC 756 was handed down. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 9:59 am
Last week, in Kilby v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 7:49 pm
In North American Catholic Educational Programming Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 12:46 pm
To paraphrase Mick Jagger—you can’t always get the international law argument you want, but sometimes, you get (some of) what you need. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 9:25 am
Olmer v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 6:12 am
My own experience is much more in the realm of defense contracting (also a common FCA context, as in last Term’s Kellogg Brown & Root Services v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 4:15 am
”The Appellate Division, noting that Civil Service Law §75 governed the disciplinary proceeding at issue in this case, explained that §75 requires that "[t]he hearing upon such charges shall be held by the officer or body having the power to remove the person against whom such charges are preferred, or by a deputy or other person designated by such officer or body in writing for that purpose. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 7:32 pm
United States) consists of a kickback conspiracy between traffic cops and body shop owners. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 8:00 am
Court of Appeals Decision; Stengel v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:38 am
See, e.g., Olsen v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:25 am
’ (People v. [read post]
