Search for: "Does, A-H"
Results 8241 - 8260
of 16,617
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2014, 2:40 pm
O’Brien, as well as his deputies William H. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 8:31 am
Finally, while certainly cognizant of the defendant’s criminal background — nineteen (19) misdemeanor convictions and one (1) felony conviction, the aforementioned and last conviction for Criminal Possession of a Forged Instrument in the Second Degree for which he received a sentence of probation — this Court does not believe that dismissal of the indictment would result in any negative impact on the confidence of the public in the system, or that dismissal of the… [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 5:00 am
Stuart H. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 1:20 pm
They were correct, for whatever else the PPACA does or does not do, it clearly and explicitly authorizes tax credits for insurance purchased on state-established exchanges, and nowhere else. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 11:00 am
Lagakos, James H. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 10:23 am
The PAST Act does. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 3:00 pm
Nobody does. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 11:22 am
After Dan Burk calculated the top IP scholars by h-index using Scholarometer, several scholars suggested to him that it would be interesting to normalize the results by seniority (because the h-index has a known seniority bias). [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 10:53 am
www.ctsmallbusinessattorney.com Daniel H. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 10:53 am
www.erskine-law.comDaniel H. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 9:05 am
We conclude that appellants have the better of the argument: a federal Exchange is not an “Exchange established by the State,” and section 36B does not authorize the IRS to provide tax credits for insurance purchased on federal Exchanges. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:32 am
For example, as was stated in Generics (UK) Limited and others v H Lundbeck A/S [2009] UKHL 12: “National courts may reach different conclusions as to the evaluation of the evidence in the light of the relevant principles, but the principles themselves should be the same, stemming as they do from the EPC. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 12:02 am
Some of the most common are that: They have been bought as an investment property (for example by a foreign investor) but the owner does not wish to rent them to tenants preferring to leave them lying empty They are owned by someone who does not want to use them but does not want to let them to tenants either – for example people who have inherited property from relatives which has a sentimental value for them, or They are in need of repair and the owner cannot… [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 4:38 pm
But we are then told that “[y]ou can customize your cycles by pressing the options desired” – does that reflect a preference for a “fast line/slow lane” approach to net neutrality? [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 5:30 am
http://t.co/oPyShZW5CY -> Regulating the internet http://t.co/Im4tmqjT6D -> Giovanetti responds to negative spin on Aereo decision http://t.co/mVlDpwv5tw -> RT @Canadaantispam: Does #CASL apply to federal, provincial, territorial and municipal governments and/or Crown Corporations? [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 2:55 pm
The court file does not reflect that the People requested a particular date. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 8:05 pm
It does not actually put people on notice that it prohibits such advertisements. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 1:12 pm
Or the person might have an employer that would sponsor them for either an immigrant petition (i.e, an I-140) or a nonimmigrant (temporary) visa type (i.e, an H-1B). [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
Injustice is relatively easy to bear; what stings is justice – H. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
Injustice is relatively easy to bear; what stings is justice – H. [read post]
