Search for: "Does 1 - 29"
Results 8241 - 8260
of 13,860
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2023, 1:13 pm
Vasquez, No. 3:13-CV-1445-B, 2013 WL 7045041, at *29 (N.D. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 3:01 pm
The rejection identified the web page reference as "Xactware.com, retrieved from the Internet Archive Wayback Machine <archive.com>, 6/29/1998." [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 6:57 am
The rest filed observations as follows: * France & Italy: 7 cases each * UK & Portugal: 5 cases each * Czech Republic: 4 cases * Germany: 3 cases * Greece, Austria, Poland & Netherlands: 2 cases each * Sweden, Denmark, Ireland, Slovenia, Spain & Finland: 1 case each Why so few Member State observations? [read post]
23 Aug 2014, 8:56 am
The Gant Court then concluded that "[i]f there is no possibility that an arrestee could reach into the area that law enforcement officers seek to search, both justifications for the search-incident-to-arrest exception are absent and the rule does not apply. [read post]
21 May 2018, 6:42 am
"The third sentence of Art 11 provides that "Member States shall also ensure that rightholders are in a position to apply for an injunction against intermediaries whose services are used by a third party to infringe an intellectual property right, without prejudice to Article 8(3) of Directive 2001/29/EC [that is the InfoSoc Directive]. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 8:54 am
See ante, at 29; see also Van Orden, 545 U. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 2:50 pm
According to a 2016 Medscape online survey, more than 7,500 doctors from more than 25 specialties agreed by nearly a 2-1 margin (57% vs. 29%) that “physician-assisted dying [should] be allowed for terminally ill patients. [read post]
17 May 2016, 4:28 am
The fact that a word is complimentary or laudatory term does not necessarily mean it is devoid of distinctive character as long as it is capable of indicating commercial origin. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 9:15 am
Bimbo argued that its trade mark enjoyed such a high reputation that it does not have to prove the aforementioned conditions for an infringement of Art. 8(5) EUTMR. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 11:07 am
The Eastern District transferred this case to the Southern District on August 29, 2022. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 1:13 pm
-How does the UNGPs discourse intersect with the extraterritorial obligations discourse? [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 12:37 pm
Thus, the President’s Dec. 1 statement is mostly accurate as a self-description of what he frequently says, at least from December 2012 onward. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 5:01 am
Perhaps she does. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 10:53 pm
-Corpus Christi Oct. 29, 2012, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 4:30 am
That pressure does not appear to be over. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 3:22 pm
” The “or” in this policy (emphasis added) does a lot of work. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 2:06 am
The fact that the sellers are aware of the existence of that trade mark and of the origin which it indicates cannot, on its own, preclude such revocation;” (Paragraphs 28/29).In response to question 2, the CJEU held that Article 12(2)(a) Directive must “be interpreted as meaning that it may be classified as ‘inactivity’ within the meaning of that provision if the proprietor of a trade mark does not encourage sellers to make more use of that mark in marketing… [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 3:40 am
TTAB Test: Does This Specimen Support Registration of FILAMENT TOWER? [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 7:55 pm
The biographies on some of the 29 governing board members come up short. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 3:46 am
Here are the details:CJEU in Huawei v ZTE Registration is now open for this rapid response event this Wednesday 29 July 2015 (5.30 for 6pm start). [read post]
