Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 8241 - 8260
of 15,353
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2014, 8:43 pm
C’est un acte dont la légalité doit être vérifiée : Ce n’est pasun pouvoir universel parce qu’elle est assujettie au respect de la légalité, c’est-à-dire, auxprescriptions de la loi et des traités. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 8:04 pm
The figure the judge ordered was far in excess of what the company deemed reasonable, so the company appealed. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 12:30 pm
In Unclean Lips, Josh Lambert addresses the Jewishness of participants in obscenity controversies in the U.S. directly, exploring the transformative roles played by a host of neglected figures in the development of modern and postmodern American culture.The diversity of American Jewry means that there is no single explanation for Jews' interventions in this field. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:30 am
Bottled water is considered a food, and we have a nice little preemption case in The Chicago Faucet Shoppe, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 9:10 pm
For those of you striving to be an employer of choice, it seems obvious that your focus should be on the former question (How can we figure out how to help this employee return to work?) [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 2:35 pm
The case in question is RS v SS [2013] EWHC B33 (Fam) and you can read more about it on the Suesspicious Minds blog if you don’t have a Times subscription. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 1:51 pm
In Virgin [Enterprises Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 6:44 am
Took weeks for Mike Masnick to figure this out. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 12:12 pm
Marshall (2006) case (which I observed as a clerk) and the Stern v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 7:26 am
Instead, the fact/nonfact distinction limits and channels defamation liability in a way that, first, we hope is objective and thus more protective of speech than a subjective standard, and second, we believe limits liability when factfinders would be inclined to protect powerful and respected figures over marginal characters—both when the marginal characters are plaintiffs and when they’re defendants. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 6:29 am
Tumblr: NYT v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 5:14 am
Two primary sources of guidance: SCt’s unanimous 2012 decision in Hosanna Taber v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 4:36 am
Phelps, Brown v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 4:06 pm
Once again, the Daily Mail is top (339) and the Sun second (128), with only the Daily Telegraph of the other papers making it into double figures (109). [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:36 pm
Here's yet another example of what weird results one sometimes gets from trying to figure out under the "categorical approach" whether a particular crime is a "crime of violence" under the sentencing guidelines. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 1:18 pm
This is one of the key challenges of the Information Age, and figuring out where to store the data is a major part of that challenge. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 9:35 am
Question: In one of your charts in Storm Center you provide some interesting figures about the Court’s subject matter docket between 1825 and 2010. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:54 am
In Gonzales v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 11:27 am
Gilles v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:10 am
Spence v. [read post]
