Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 8241 - 8260
of 21,113
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2017, 6:29 pm
We will defend your constitutional rights and freedoms as well as file complaints on your behalf. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 6:26 pm
However, the appeals court pointed out that such a legal duty would be upon the hospital to ensure the patient’s safety and well-being, rather than its parent corporations, i.e., the defendants. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 6:24 pm
She argued that the defendant was liable for breach of contract because he had a contractual obligation to perform an appendectomy, which is the removal of the appendix, not a portion of the appendix. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 9:37 am
And by naming multiple defendants, you will increase the chance of being fully compensated for your injuries. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 9:22 am
MCMC LLC 16-1409 Issue: Whether, under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act’s complete preemption doctrine, federal courts are precluded from exercising federal question jurisdiction over independent state law claims against third-party service providers who cannot be liable or a proper defendant under ERISA, 29 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 8:41 am
Then maybe we could hold them liable for punitive damages. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 10:42 am
Union Carbide Corp., 577 F.3d 1234, 1244 (10th Cir. 2009) (no material difference between Second and Third Restatements; holding that ‘‘a defendant cannot be liable to the plaintiff unless its conduct is either (a) a but-for cause of the plaintiff’s injury or (b) a necessary component of a causal set that (probably) would have caused the injury in the absence of other causes. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 9:34 am
The defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, claiming that as a matter of law, they cannot be held liable for the plaintiff’s injuries because the plaintiff admitted to having knowledge of the dangerous condition that caused her injuries. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 7:57 am
Second, courts considering claims under the ATS should also take into account not only whether international law recognizes the norm that has allegedly been violated, but also whether international law would allow this particular defendant to be held liable for violating it, “if the defendant is a private actor such as a corporation or individual. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 7:41 am
” FMLA regulations and Third Circuit precedent also support the conclusion that an individual supervisor could be liable. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 1:23 pm
They jointly owned an automobile insurance policy issued by the defendant. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 9:05 am
The 911 call reportedly begins with the voice of an unidentified man, but later defendant mother is on the line. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 6:47 am
” Suh, an American citizen and law clerk at the Riverdale County Public Defender’s Office, reported the case to the Department of Fair Employment and Housing. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 3:00 am
The Court noted that Plaintiffs had directly identified the Valero plant as the site of the Contamination Event and pleaded that Defendants’ negligent conduct in operation of the plant rendered them liable on many of common-law claims. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 12:09 pm
Any award of damages in a Massachusetts injury case, whether through a plaintiff’s verdict or settlement agreement, can still present challenges if the defendants either fail to pay or cannot pay the ordered amount. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 9:44 am
During the course of the plaintiff’s treatment, the defendant recommended that the plaintiff undergo a total laparoscopic hysterectomy. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 8:00 am
Some of these states and cities even indicate that parents can be liable even if they don’t know underage drinking was taking place in their home. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 8:00 am
Some of these states and cities even indicate that parents can be liable even if they don’t know underage drinking was taking place in their home. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 8:00 am
Some of these states and cities even indicate that parents can be liable even if they don’t know underage drinking was taking place in their home. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 8:03 pm
Macfarlane] then assert that a trustee should not be liable in his personal capacity where the defendant was aware that it was dealing with him in his capacity as a trustee, relying on Gordon v Roebuck, [1992] OJ No. [read post]
