Search for: "Matter of Mark T." Results 8241 - 8260 of 16,585
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2014, 4:35 am
[T]he issue . . . was whether an employee violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:21 am
Elsewhere, the jiplp weblog carries a Current Intelligence note from Mira T. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 7:00 am by Jennifer Williams
Based on our analysis, which draws on a longer study published in the Journal of Peace Research, it turns out that several factors, including ideology, matter, but not necessarily in the ways we often assume. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 2:46 am
 Whether this should be the case is a matter for discussion. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 2:25 pm
Laughing matter. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 11:24 am
  Thus Tincher’s reworking of strict liability doesn’t affect prescription medical products because that theory wasn’t applicable in the first place. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 10:31 am by Jonathan Bailey
Bottom Line While Getty has worked hard to soften its image on copyright matters, those efforts have yet to produce a viable solution for bloggers and non-commercial users. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 8:00 am by Alex Ely
It seems to mark the first instance of a military employee refusing, on professional responsibility grounds, to administer treatment of this kind to Guantanamo detainees. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 5:14 am by SHG
  You can’t have your privacy violated if you don’t know your privacy is violated. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 1:22 am by Jani
Syal could face a civil action for the infringement of that trademark or its possible dilution.Great flavors can lead to unpleasant results, no matter how deliciousAs was seen in Qualitex v Jacobson Products, discussed by Justice Costa in the case at hand, a trademark can potentially be "...almost anything at all that is capable of carrying meaning" - even a flavor, at least prima facie, as long as it indicates a source for the goods: "[T]he essence of a protected… [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:44 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
" ChemTech 23 (6), 1993, p. 51-59See the IPBiz post The citations found in patents: do references cited by the applicant matter? [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 4:23 pm
The Court of Appeal has agreed, holding that the invention is excluded matter, having no relevant technical effect.What is a lantana? [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 3:02 pm
***************************************Trade mark oppositions:don't expect a quick resultSays Merpel: in the first case the opposed CTM application was filed in December 2006; that's nearly eight years ago. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 12:31 pm by Recommind
  Discovery solutions, he explained, that didn’t address those needs were missing the mark. [read post]