Search for: "Personality Productions, Inc." Results 8241 - 8260 of 12,377
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2021, 1:04 pm by Dean I Weitzman, Esq.
When a product has risks known to its manufacturer, warning labels must be provided, or products must be recalled. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 4:09 am by Marie Louise
A-G’s opinion published – Merck & Co Inc. v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt (EPLAW) (The SPC Blog) US: Supreme Court to revisit patentable subject matter eligibility of medical diagnostic methods:  Mayo v Prometheus (Patently-O) (Patent Baristas) (PharmaPatents) (IPBiz) (Patent Law Practice Center) US: Intellectual property problems for personalized medicine (BIOtechNow) US: Supreme Court ruling in Stanford v Roche (IPKat) (IPKat) US: Manager’s… [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
Medtronic, Inc., 231 F.3d 216, 230 (6th Cir. 2001).Kemp concluded that the purported "violations" before it were not violations at all - but merely reflected Plaintiffs' incorrect reading of FDA requirements. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 12:26 am
The Supreme Court had their first occasion to consider the interplay of these two provisions in the Quality King Distributors, Inc v L'Anza Research International, Inc. (1998). [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:38 am by Kedar Bhatia
American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:16 am
The charges had been signed for by a person named `Robert. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 7:26 am
Successful economic activity is increasingly a function of the personal celebrity of those who front the enterprise; it is not the value of the product or servuce offered but the celebrity of those who "vouch for" that product or service that adds value.The Change Co. seemed like the perfect company for Colin Kaepernick’s SPAC to buy. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 6:28 am by Barry Sookman
Google Inc., 2015 BCCA 265 in which the court granted a world-wide de-indexing order against Google to prevent access to websites that had been found to violate orders of a BC court in a case in which the defendants were selling and offering for sale products which Equustek claimed, among other things, misappropriated its trade secrets, infringed its registered and unregistered trade-marks, passed-off its products for those of Equustek, infringed its copyrights,… [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm by Ad Law Defense
., Frito-Lay, Kettle Foods Inc., and Lance Inc.. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 7:56 am
Failure to comply with either type of subpoena means that the person or entity that was subpoenaed will be held in contempt. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 12:59 pm by Matthew Dochnal
A holding company you might know of is Alphabet, Inc., also known as “Google”. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 5:00 pm
Infringement hinged on whether the accused product game pieces moved. [read post]