Search for: "STATE v. FIELDS"
Results 8241 - 8260
of 12,946
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2012, 10:06 pm
In addition, if Amar is right that “Any law, state or federal, heaping disabilities or dishonor upon any citizen by dint of his or her birth status — because he was born black, or because she was born female or out of wedlock — violates a core principle of the Fourteenth Amendment’s opening sentence,” then laws denying the vote to women were banned by the Fourteenth Amendment, and there was no need for the Nineteenth Amendment (which finally banned sex… [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 7:39 am
In Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:47 am
They opened the car door, retrieved the suspected narcotics, and conducted a field test, which was positive for cocaine. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:58 am
LA Fitness International: Shifting Costs to Seek Fairness in Discovery – Reed Smith – http://bit.ly/NejzAg (Patricia Antezana) Warrantless Phone Search Deemed Unconstitutional; Destroys State’s Murder Case – http://bit.ly/P5BXJW (IT-Lex) We Produced Privileged Documents; Now What? [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 8:52 am
(Expression v. traditional advertising may have something to do with the differences here—NFU is problematic perhaps because it spans both types of uses, whereas Rogers is for expression that isn’t standard advertising.) [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 7:52 am
Justice Kennedy wrote: "[I]n Sakraida v. [read post]
College Football Predictions for FBS Week 3 2012 by SportPundit and the Yards Per Play System YPPSYS
10 Sep 2012, 12:12 pm
Result: Morgan State v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 10:00 am
United States (11-597). [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 9:47 am
Read the decision at: R v Tranberg. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 5:52 am
Schnabel v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 5:30 am
Steven holds six patents in the field of content authentication, is the founder and CEO of a content authentication provider. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
State v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 10:05 pm
In People v Lopez, an undercover narcotics officer approached defendant and who were standing outside a building located 420 feet from a public school in Bronx County. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 1:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 3:32 pm
Trades Council of Cal., AFL-CIO v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm
In EEOC v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 12:48 pm
Kairies v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 12:15 pm
Its general rule, Article 4 (1), points to the law of the state in which the damage occured, i.e. either the state of the investors’ home or that of their bank accounts. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 8:08 am
This list relies on self-reporting by law professors who claim to be teachers or specialists in the field. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:04 am
Vita-Mix loses an appeal to the CAFC:Vita-Mix Corporation (“Vita-Mix”) appeals from the district court’s final judgment in which the court con-cluded that Vita-Mix infringed the asserted claims of two United States patents, K-TEC, Inc. v. [read post]
