Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 8241 - 8260
of 16,401
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2015, 8:27 am
They cite Lord Nicholls in Douglas v Hello 3 (OBG v Allan) as clearly stating that the concept of breach of confidence and misuse of private information “now covers two distinct causes of action”. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:15 am
This was expanded on in that there was clearly no possibility of a mutually agreeable settlement if each party was to maintain their proposed price, and movement on this fundamental point seemed unlikely (and in any case would be seen as against competition law).Each party was then given 5 minutes to state their conclusions. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 5:19 am
In Young v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:20 am
Preska, Chief United States District Court Judge for the Southern District of New York, rule [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
In the most recent case on the topic, Rodriguez v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 3:23 am
THE PEOPLE V. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 1:00 am
Tucker served as lead counsel in both Glucksberg v Washington and Quill v NY, which raised federal constitutional claims seeking to establish the right; both cases were heard by the Supreme Court of the United States in the mid-1990s. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 9:30 pm
Indeed, many have argued that the aspiration of Brown v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:01 pm
Corey Brettschneider & Nelson TebbeLast week, the Court heard arguments in Walker v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 6:23 am
Arnold is admitted to practice in all state courts in North Carolina, in the United States Federal Court for the Western District of North Carolina, in the North Carolina Court of Appeals and Supreme Court, and in the Fourth Circuit United States Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 9:30 pm
The legitimacy of presidential constitutionalism is frequently debated, most recently in the context of President Obama’s refusal to defend the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
Splitting the Baby: The Supreme Court’s Ruling in Young v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 3:59 pm
Hardy, R (on the application of) v Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council [2015] EWHC 890 Oh, we have been waiting for this one. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 1:41 pm
The court, therefore, rejected a per se argument and concluded that a pregnant worker seeking to show disparate treatment must satisfy the McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 6:36 am
First up is Bullard v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
In its March 25, 2015 decision in Halioris v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 8:00 pm
It also supports employers in imposing other strong disciplinary measures on employees who abuse such policies. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 5:42 pm
State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 5:42 pm
State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 5:41 pm
As Lord Browne-Wilkinson said in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex p Pierson [1998] AC 539: A power conferred by Parliament in general terms is not to be taken to authorise the doing of acts by the donee of the power which adversely affect the legal rights of the citizen or the basic principles on which the law of the United Kingdom is based unless the statute conferring the power makes it clear that such was the intention of Parliament. [read post]
