Search for: "Deal v. Deal"
Results 8261 - 8280
of 38,578
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2012, 2:51 am
The en banc decision is Great American E&S Insurance Company v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 10:43 am
" -- this Kat has only just got round to writing up the decision of Mrs Justice Proudman, of the Chancery Division (England and Wales) in Future Publishing Ltd v Edge Interactive Media Inc, Edge Games Inc and Dr Timothy Langdell [2011] EWHC 1489 (Ch), the sort of case which makes this Kat at any rate very pleased he doesn't have to deal with litigants in person (as was the third defendant in this case), despite his fabled patience. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 1:07 pm
Brown, 416 F.3d 980 (9th Cir. 2005), the Ninth Circuit had held that the secret deal between one of Silva's codefendants was material exculpatory evidence that should have been provided to the defense under Brady v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 10:14 am
But with every deal like Sharp-Huawei and Conversant-Huawei, it becomes clearer that higher levels of the supply chain must be considered as well, and may even represent the point of maximum licensing efficiency.I'd like to share more information from the Conversant v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 2:19 am
High Court steps in The judgment of Beatson J is thorough in dealing with the facts of the case, but its wider value lies in its discussion of the “underlying principles” of the right to free expression from, [39] onwards. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:13 am
Case citation: Davis v. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 7:26 am
The defendant’s marketing featured its house mark BagSpot extensively, which helps inform consumers that they aren’t dealing with the plaintiff. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 1:10 pm
As were most of the participants in this botched gun sale/drug deal/whatever it was. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 11:31 am
Plus maybe it would make a bit more money on the deal itself.Which works. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:18 am
In Reno v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 6:06 pm
Goodman v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 10:25 am
See Sasqua v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 6:08 am
This application was referred to the Grand Chamber and was heard on 13 October 2010 along with Von Hannover v Germany (No.2). [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 2:29 am
" The case is United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 8:21 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
But perhaps the most important majority opinion she wrote—one that could have a tremendous impact on the outcome of the 2020 election—deals not with women’s rights but with voters’ rights: Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 5:29 am
Mammone v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 4:48 pm
Although the case doesn’t deal with time travel like the name might suggest (so disappointing!) [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 5:22 am
Newell v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:50 am
West Coast Productions v. [read post]
