Search for: "R. B." Results 8261 - 8280 of 55,746
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Articles by Robin Fretwell Wilson, David Orentlicher, Shaakirrah R. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:30 pm by Guido Paola
The European search report, which was transmitted to the then applicant by a communication dated 23 May 2006, cited the following two documents as technological background ("A" documents):D1: Baeza-Yates, R. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:02 pm by Adam Levitin
The language of 363(k) is not as clear as it could be about this issue:   At a sale under subsection (b) of this section of property that is subject to a lien that secures an allowed claim, the holder of such claim may bid at such sale, and, if the holder of such claim purchases such property, such holder may offset such claim against the purchase price of such property. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 9:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
Dans son opinion préliminaire, la Chambre avait exprimé son accord avec les arguments de défaut de nouveauté de la composition revendiquée vis à vis des exemples comparatifs A et B de D1. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:56 am by Giles Peaker
” In the present case, the principle adopted is (at 68) In my judgment, for a dwelling to be fit for habitation within the meaning of the Act, it must, on completion (without any remedial works being carried out):(a) be capable of occupation for a reasonable time without risk to the health or safety of the occupants: where a dwelling is or is part of a newly constructed building, what is a reasonable time will be a question of fact (it may or may not be as long as the design life of the… [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 9:31 am by Administrator
.), Montréal, 500-09-026870-170Décision de : Juges Nicole Duval Hesler (juge en chef), Marie-France Bich, Dominique Bélanger, Manon Savard et Robert M. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 8:41 am by Lee E. Berlik
Here’s what the noncompete in that case said: For one year after my employment with O’Sullivan ends, either voluntarily or for cause, I agree that I will not (a) sell, attempt to sell, or assist others in selling or providing products or services in competition with the Business of O’Sullivan at the Restricted Contacts; or (b) help, financially or otherwise, any person or entity to compete with the Business of O’Sullivan by using or contacting the Restricted… [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 5:58 am by Eugene Volokh
As Stanley correctly noted, there is no clear statement of that intent in section 24-5(b). [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 3:39 pm by Eugene Volokh
So I think that if he had been prosecuted under the nonimmigrant alien ban (922(g)(5)(B)) he would have been convicted even with a mens rea requirement. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 5:42 am by Public Employment Law Press
Perricone, No. 2018-B-1233, in which the court considered whether Perricone violated his ethical obligations as an attorney as a result of anonymous comments that he posted online between 2007-2014. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 3:45 pm by Brett Trout
The New Groupings of Abstract Ideas The groupings of subject matter under Step 2A that are considered “abstract ideas” are as follows: (a) Mathematical concepts—mathematical relationships, mathematical formulas or equations, mathematical calculations; (b) Certain methods of organizing human activity—fundamental economic principles or practices (including hedging, insurance, mitigating risk); commercial or legal interactions (including agreements in the form of… [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 8:00 am by Mike Habib, EA
Specifically, the due date for furnishing to individuals the 2018 Form 1095-B (Health Coverage) and the 20 [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 6:30 am
Todd Henderson (University of Chicago) and Max Raskin (NYU), on Wednesday, January 9, 2019 Tags: Bitcoin, Cryptocurrency, Financial technology, Howey test, ICOs, Information asymmetries, Information environment, Innovation, investor, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities enforcement, Securities regulation The Government Shutdown’s Effect on Deals Posted by Andrew R. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 4:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In the JCA, the Tenants that executed the agreement, defined in the JCA as “Tenants,” each agreed to share both the expenses in prosecuting the lawsuit against Landlord and any recovery received from Landlord (Felix Moving Affirmation, Exhibit “B”, at 1 [the Tenants agreed to “pool their claims and share in any recovery, payment or compensation of any nature paid by” Landlord]). [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 3:20 am
No procedural consequences follow from Art. 108 EPC, second sentence; these are exclusively governed by R. 101 (1) EPC”. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 2:27 pm by Kyle T. Mordew
Accordingly, clients and attorneys should again be wary of both a) attempting to use a DAPT when claims already exist, and b) establishing a DAPT for a non-DAPT state resident. [read post]