Search for: "State v. Su" Results 8261 - 8280 of 30,109
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2017, 7:45 am
Disclaimer: not one of the uniformsat the centre of the caseThe US copyright decision everybody was waiting for is finally out.In Star Athletica v Varsity Brands the US Supreme Court has just ruled that cheerleading uniforms are eligible for copyright protection ['copyrightable', to use the US copyright jargon].The lawThe US Copyright Act, §101 states that “pictorial, graphic, or sculptural features” of the “design of a useful article”… [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 6:43 am by R Grace Rodriguez
 Roberts and his co-workers sued stating that they were being fired for expressing their free speech rights under the First Amended. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 5:00 am by Woodrow Pollack
 But PK states that Stock was not authorized to provide such a license. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 8:10 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
  She subsequently sued her former employer, asserting causes of action for, inter alia, violation of the MMA and wrongful discharge. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Transgender client of New York City's HIV/AIDS Service Administration sues after agency refused to change its records to reflect her legal name and change of genderDoe v City of New York, 2013 NY Slip Op 23403, Supreme Court, New York County  A transgender female client of the New York City Human Resources Administration's (HRA) HIV/AIDS Services Administration (HASA) sued HASA after her request that HASA update its records to reflect her legal name change and change… [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 5:21 am by Staci Zaretsky
[New York Post] * This just got really interesting: The anonymous Proskauer partner who is suing the firm in a $50 million gender bias case has come forward and revealed her name. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 10:04 am by Sanford Hausler
  The government did not argue that the account was independent of Trump's presidency, but that the act of blocking was not state action. [read post]
26 May 2015, 8:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
” Further, the Appellate Division commented that “in any event, mere silence is insufficient to invoke the doctrine of equitable estoppel, citing Ross v Louise Wise Servs. [read post]