Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 8261 - 8280 of 14,200
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2014, 6:59 am
Today, I’ll close out by taking the broader view: What does all this tell us about Bivens doctrine? [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 5:45 am by Wells Bennett
Meade today, to view pre-trial hearings in the military commission case of United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 4:56 am by Florian Mueller
as far as the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice (DoJ) is concerned. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 12:34 am by INFORRM
This would extend the protection of citizens beyond that which is available in the United States. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 8:16 am by WIMS
Moniz to Georgia, Energy Department Scheduled to Close on $6.5 billion in Loan Guarantees to Construct New Nuclear Power Plant Reactors Project represents first new nuclear reactors to begin construction in the United States in three decades <> Energy Secretary Moniz: Marcellus Shale Production 'Critical' and 'Amazing' - This week, U.S. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 5:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Press is rapidly abandoning scrutiny of gov’t: closing capitol bureaus. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 5:45 pm by Wells Bennett
Although the precise start date remains the subject of litigation—see United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 5:38 am by Marty Lederman
  Indeed, the government argues that Congress should be assumed to have adopted the "rule" the Court announced in United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 11:54 am by Schachtman
Richard Posner is a judge of the United States Court of Appeals, for the Seventh Circuit. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 8:28 am by Yishai Schwartz
Jane followed up with a close analysis arguing that the true significance of the case lay in its expansion of habeas jurisdiction asserted by the courts in Boumediene v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 6:35 am
Central planning, not the welfare state, is what was incompatible with individual liberty. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm by Dr. Mel Kramer
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in the matter styled APHA v. [read post]