Search for: "C. R. C." Results 8281 - 8300 of 58,028
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2014, 2:26 pm by Giles Peaker
Interviews to be held w/c 17 March Details and application form fromwww.marywardlegal.org.uk Registered charity number 1024148. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 1:15 pm by M. David Hoyle
§ 6(c) “cannot constitutionally be enforced to the extent that it[] prevent[s] the Director from reviewing final decisions rendered by APJs. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 2:26 pm by Giles Peaker
Interviews to be held w/c 17 March Details and application form fromwww.marywardlegal.org.uk Registered charity number 1024148. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 1:37 pm by Rob McKinney
If you had a case with the docket number 2011-C-___ , you may have rights to get the case reopened.Her is a report on the story here. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 3:00 am by Julitza Perez
Mientras se continúan litigando muchas de las reclamaciones al seguro por los daños ocasionados por el Huracán María, observamos como los tribunales comienzan a evaluar y aplicar en cada caso las enmiendas realizadas al Código de Seguros de Puerto Rico tales como el nuevo proceso de “appraisal”. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 6:45 am by Colin Zick
§ 1028A, which says: Whoever, during and in relation to any felony violation enumerated in subsection (c), knowingly transfers, possesses, or uses, without lawful authority, a means of identification of another person shall, in addition to the punishment provided for such felony, be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 2 years. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 5:07 pm by Marie Wood
Sin embargo, las mujeres y los niños inmigrantes son particularmente vulnerables ya que el cónyuge que es ciudadano estadounidense (Ciudadano) o residente legal permanente (Residente) puede utilizar la inmigración como otro medio de controlar a la víctima. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 5:59 am by Colin Zick
  The full statement of the EU Working Party is provided below: Following the landmark ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) of 6 October 2015 in the Maximilian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner case (C-362- 14), the EU data protection authorities assembled in the Article 29 Working Party have discussed the first consequences to be drawn at European and national level....... [read post]