Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 8281 - 8300 of 15,525
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2014, 7:47 am by Joy Waltemath
At least for now, the appeals court held, Notre Dame failed to show the regulations worked a substantial burden on its religious faith (University of Notre Dame v Sebelius, February 21, 2014, Posner, R). [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 4:12 am
Hearst Holdings Inc & Another v A.V.E.L.A. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:17 am
The Legislative Budget Board, however, proposed a number of additions to this cost, to better take into account the costs of complying with Ruiz v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 2:42 pm by Ken White
Bunton, 94 S.W.3d 561, 580 (Tex.2002) (public figure); Turner v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 7:31 am by Dan Harris
Then after you have been in that job for a year or two, start figuring out how to “make it your own. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 7:32 am
”[111] It’s hard to figure out exactly what the first part of this means. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 8:43 pm by ALBERTO HUAPAYA OLIVARES
C’est un acte dont la légalité doit être vérifiée : Ce n’est pasun pouvoir universel parce qu’elle est assujettie au respect de la légalité, c’est-à-dire, auxprescriptions de la loi et des traités. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 8:04 pm by Peter Vickery
The figure the judge ordered was far in excess of what the company deemed reasonable, so the company appealed. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 12:30 pm by Karen Tani
In Unclean Lips, Josh Lambert addresses the Jewishness of participants in obscenity controversies in the U.S. directly, exploring the transformative roles played by a host of neglected figures in the development of modern and postmodern American culture.The diversity of American Jewry means that there is no single explanation for Jews' interventions in this field. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:30 am
Bottled water is considered a food, and we have a nice little preemption case in The Chicago Faucet Shoppe, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 3:19 am by David DePaolo
I've blogged before that presumptions in workers' compensation tend to prolong litigation and make for bad precedence, and a recent California case highlights that concern.The First District Court of Appeals in California will decide whether a municipal employer had successfully rebutted the presumption of industrial causation for a novice police officer's colon cancer in light of evidence that the disease takes decades to develop.In City of Paso Robles v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 9:10 pm by Jeff Nowak
  For those of you striving to be an employer of choice, it seems obvious that your focus should be on the former question (How can we figure out how to help this employee return to work?) [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 2:35 pm by familoo
The case in question is RS v SS [2013] EWHC B33 (Fam) and you can read more about it on the Suesspicious Minds blog if you don’t have a Times subscription. [read post]