Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 8281 - 8300
of 21,695
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2016, 8:15 am
The high water mark for the PTAB came in June 2016 when the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in Cuozzo Speed Technologies v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 1:05 am
This point was argued for Ms Watts by Mark Wonnacott QC (who argued successfully for the tenant in Mexfield Housing Co-Op v Berrisford), whose The History of Landlord and Tenant should have been on everybody’s Santa list. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 6:11 pm
See Threadgill v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 3:00 pm
In contrast however, I did very much like Sir Mark Hedley’s little book, The Modern Judge. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 10:57 am
Copyright * Goldstein v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 5:07 am
” Briefly: At The Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center blog, Lisa Soronen summarizes the State and Local Legal Center’s amicus brief in Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
Clark, Loyola Law School, Los Angeles Mark A. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 2:32 pm
I wrote little in March and April because I went to the states on holiday for 3 weeks to see family. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 8:30 am
Super 8 Worldwide Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 5:00 am
By Mark S. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 3:30 am
” Promark v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 1:20 pm
The 2016 presidential campaign season, however, marked a political turning point. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:37 am
See Larry Harmon Pictures Corp. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 10:01 pm
Acceptance of the writ, which is rare, would mean the two DeCoster v. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 9:31 pm
Still Seeking Contraceptive Compromise After Zubik v. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 7:45 am
Haverty-Stacke, Trotskyists on Trial: Free Speech and Political Persecution Since the Age of FDR Sanford V. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 7:00 am
Orin Kerr responded to April Doss’s earlier post on United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 6:50 am
In Smedley v Smedley, 2014 WL 11996390 (E.D. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 1:24 pm
” That right, at least as Louis Vuitton wants to wield the statute, is in fatal tension with the First Amendment, according to the amicus brief, which cites the 2nd Circuit’s 2012 expansion of free speech rights in U.S. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 8:11 am
(Holt v. [read post]
