Search for: "R. D. C." Results 8281 - 8300 of 20,627
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2015, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
  Using my Apple TV, I'd have to wait a long time for videos to buffer, and they would often pause in the middle of watching a video to buffer again. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 8:15 pm
(C) Where the elective share of the surviving spouse does not exceed twenty-five hundred dollars, the surviving spouse has the right to elect to take his elective share absolutely, which shall be in lieu of any provision for his benefit in the will. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 5:34 pm by ALBERTO HUAPAYA OLIVARES
En tal caso, el período transcurrido entre la notificación del consentimiento y la de su revocación no se tendrá en cuenta para el cómputo de los plazos previstos en el apartado 4 del artículo 16 del Convenio. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 8:00 am
In order to prove a privacy claim, the plaintiff must prove that (a) she had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the specific situation, (b) that the defendant intentionally intruded in this place/circumstance, (c) that a reasonable person would find the intrusion highly offensive, (d) that the plaintiff suffered harm, and (e) that the defendant’s actions were a substantial causal factor in this harm. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 7:31 am by Inside Privacy
Joe Barton (R-TX) and Bobby Rush (D-IL) re-introduced the Data Accountability and Trust Act (DATA Act) in the House of Representatives. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
The most-consulted French-language decision was R. c. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 1:09 pm by Michael Geist
Second, Bill C-51 is a problem not only because it fails to address longstanding shortcomings in oversight and accountability over CSIS. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 12:53 pm by emagraken
 22: In my view the discretion provided for in R.11-7(6)(c) must be exercised sparingly, with appropriate caution, and in a disciplined way given the express requirements contained in Rules 11-6 and 11-7. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 8:50 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
TAYLOR, 353 U.S. 569 (1957), WHICH STATED “NO [SUCH] AUTHORITY” EXISTS; (B) THE PLAIN LANGUAGE OF THE STATUTE INCLUDING THE CONJUNCTIVE “FINDINGS AND SENTENCE” IN ARTICLE 66(d) IN CONTRAST TO AUTHORITY GRANTED THE JUDGE ADVOCATES GENERAL IN ARTICLE 69(a) TO ACT WITH RESPECT TO “FINDINGS AND SENTENCE OR BOTH” AND THE CONVENING AUTHORITY IN ARTICLE 60(f)(3) TO ORDER SENTENCE REHEARINGS; AND (C) JUDICIAL ECONOMY. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
School of Law) Christopher Jon Sprigman (NYU School of Law) Geoffrey R. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 5:58 am
Patent No. 7,772,209 - and asks the court for: a) A judgment that Fresenius has infringed the '209 patent and/or will infringe, actively induce infringement of, and/or contribute to infringement by others of the '209 patent; b) A judgment ordering that the effective date of any FDA approval for Fresenius to make, use, offer for sale, sell, market, distribute, or import Fresenius' ANDA Product, or any product the use of which infringes the '209 patent, be not earlier than the… [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 9:20 pm
Il étudie la genèse du nouveau traité et retrace les rebondissements qui ont précédé son adoption. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 7:37 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
And while the NFL may enjoy tax exempt status under section 501(c)(6) of the Internal Revenue Code, not all dollars escape taxation. [read post]